GeForce GT 730 vs GeForce GTX 1630: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.
Compare with AIAdvantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GT 730 is better1
Launch price $80 lower$69 vs $149
Where GeForce GTX 1630 is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GT 7301,190.7 sGeForce GTX 1630no dataNo advantage conclusion: no comparable result for the second model.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
1,190.7 s · community measurement, sample 3 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 3 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1186.2–1320.01; submissions 2021-08-28 to 2021-12-09; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- no comparable result
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Reference results (24)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 958.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 880.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 1,127.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 951.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 3,615.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 3,803.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 3,425.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 3,123 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 2,557.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 2,499.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 4,230.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 5,368.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 6,575.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 44.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 43.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 40.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 39.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 39.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 44.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 37.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 34 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 24.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 283 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 247.6 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GT 730 | B · GeForce GTX 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | no data | TU117-150-KA-A1 | no data for A |
| Architecture | no data | Turing | no data for A |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | no data | 512 (CUDA cores) | no data for A |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | no data | 1,740 MHz | no data for A |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | no data | 1,785 MHz | no data for A |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | no data | 4 GB | no data for A |
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 | no data for A |
| Memory bus | no data | 64 bit | no data for A |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | no data | 96 GB/s | no data for A |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | no data | 75 W (TDP) | no data for A |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 | no data | no data for B |
Chip
GPU chip
Ano data
BTU117-150-KA-A1
no data for AArchitecture
Ano data
BTuring
no data for AShader units
Ano data
B512 (CUDA cores)
no data for AShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
Ano data
B1,740 MHz
no data for ABoost clock
Ano data
B1,785 MHz
no data for AClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
Ano data
B4 GB
no data for AMemory type
Ano data
BGDDR6
no data for AMemory bus
Ano data
B64 bit
no data for AMemory bandwidth
Ano data
B96 GB/s
no data for AExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
Ano data
B75 W (TDP)
no data for ATGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 2.0
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.