GeForce GT 630 vs GeForce GTX 750: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.
Compare with AIAdvantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GT 630 is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where GeForce GTX 750 is better1
Memory bandwidth 51.4 GB/s more80.2 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GT 6301,248 sGeForce GTX 750467 sNo advantage conclusion: small sample in one of the results.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
1,248 s · community measurement, sample 1 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 1 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1247.99–1247.99; submissions 2021-05-16 to 2021-05-16; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
467 s · community measurement, sample 3 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 3 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 452.16–474.52; submissions 2020-10-06 to 2020-11-16; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Reference results (17)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 1,133.8 | 469 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 463.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 397.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 504.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 623.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 358.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,657.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,508.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 3,437.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 2,023.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 3,228.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 2,929.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 134 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 87 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 94.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 86.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 98.8 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GT 630 | B · GeForce GTX 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | GF108-400-A1 | no data | no data for B |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 96 (CUDA cores) | 512 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 810 MHz | no data | no data for B |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 1 GB | no data | no data for B |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 | differs |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 128 bit | equal |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 28.8 GB/s | 80.2 GB/s | B: 51.4 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 65 W (TDP) | no data | no data for B |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 | differs |
Chip
GPU chip
AGF108-400-A1
Bno data
no data for BArchitecture
AFermi
BMaxwell
differsShader units
A96 (CUDA cores)
B512 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A810 MHz
Bno data
no data for B
Memory
Video memory
A1 GB
Bno data
no data for BMemory type
ADDR3
BGDDR5
differsMemory bus
A128 bit
B128 bit
equalMemory bandwidth
A28.8 GB/s
B80.2 GB/s
B: 51.4 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A65 W (TDP)
Bno data
no data for BTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 2.0 x16
BPCIe 3.0 x16
differs
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Which PCIe interface do the cards use?
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630: PCIe 2.0 x16. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750: PCIe 3.0 x16.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.