Skip to content
RU

GeForce 930A vs GeForce GTX 690: specs and benchmark comparison

ANVIDIA · GeForce

NVIDIA GeForce 930A

    BNVIDIA · GeForce GTX

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

    • 300 W

    May 3, 2012 · $999 at launch

    Short verdict

    Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.

    Compare with AI

    Advantages

    Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

    Where GeForce 930A is better0

    No advantages found in our data.

    Where GeForce GTX 690 is better0

    No advantages found in our data.

    Benchmarks

    Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

    • Blender Benchmark 2.82

      GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better

      No advantage conclusion: small sample in one of the results.

      About the measurement and source
      A · NVIDIA GeForce 930A

      870.4 s · community measurement, sample 1 · November 14, 2026

      Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

      Median of 1 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 870.44–870.44; submissions 2020-06-05 to 2020-06-05; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

      B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

      231.7 s · community measurement, sample 2 · November 14, 2026

      Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

      Median of 2 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 230.73–232.72; submissions 2020-02-28 to 2020-03-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

      difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

      Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.

    Reference results (7)
    BenchmarkABDifference
    Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)—239.3no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA)—820no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)—451.2no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA)—816.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)—1,321.1no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—184.2no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—180.2no pair

    Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

    Specifications

    Clocks

    • Base clock

      Ano data

      B915 MHz

      no data for A
    • Boost clock

      Ano data

      B1,019 MHz

      no data for A

      Clocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.

    Memory

    • Memory type

      Ano data

      BGDDR5

      no data for A

    Power and dimensions

    • Board power

      Ano data

      B300 W (TDP)

      no data for A

      TGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.

    • Interface

      Ano data

      BPCIe 3.0 x16

      no data for A

    “More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

    Compare with AI

    An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

    AI verdict
    Data sources (3)

    How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

    TelegramVK