Arc A750 vs Arc B580: specs and benchmark comparison
Rendering and compute
depends on the taskBenchmark results disagree, so the choice depends on the specific task.
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Arc A750 is better3
Compute units 8 more28 Xe-core vs 20 Xe-core
Memory bus 64 bit more256 bit vs 192 bit
Memory bandwidth 56 GB/s more512 GB/s vs 456 GB/s
Where Arc B580 is better5
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 6% faster2,376 samples/min vs 2,240 samples/min
Video memory 4 GB more12 GB vs 8 GB
Memory speed 3 Gbps more19 Gbps vs 16 Gbps
Board power 35 W lower190 W (TBP) vs 225 W (TBP)
Launch price $40 lower$249 vs $289
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 6%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
Arc A750 Graphics2,240.4 samples/minArc B580 Graphics2,375.9 samples/minIntel Arc B580 Graphics is ahead by 6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · Intel Arc A750 Graphics
2,240.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 71 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 71 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1811.4–2427.09; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-03-08; ONEAPI backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · Intel Arc B580 Graphics
2,375.9 samples/min · community measurement, sample 113 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 113 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2336.49–2412.13; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-09-18; ONEAPI backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (2)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,089 | 1,823.3 | A +14.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,260.9 | 2,079.6 | A +8.7% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (12)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,990.2 | 1,881.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,599.3 | 2,741.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,931.5 | 2,854.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,600.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,667.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,661.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,052.7 | 1,693.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,945.8 | 1,690.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,129.7 | 1,704.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,610.6 | 2,825.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,438.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 1,750.2 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · Arc A750 | B · Arc B580 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | Xe-HPG | Xe2 | differs |
| Compute unitsSM (NVIDIA), CU (AMD) and Xe-core (Intel) are different units and are not compared numerically across vendors. | 28 Xe-core | 20 Xe-core | A: 8 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 2,050 MHz | 2,670 MHz | B: 620 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB | B: 4 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 192 bit | A: 64 bit more |
| Memory speed | 16 Gbps | 19 Gbps | B: 3 Gbps more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 512 GB/s | 456 GB/s | A: 56 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 225 W (TBP) | 190 W (TBP) | A: 35 W higher |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 | differs |
Chip
Architecture
AXe-HPG
BXe2
differsCompute units
A28 Xe-core
B20 Xe-core
A: 8 moreSM (NVIDIA), CU (AMD) and Xe-core (Intel) are different units and are not compared numerically across vendors.
Clocks
Base clock
A2,050 MHz
B2,670 MHz
B: 620 MHz more
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B12 GB
B: 4 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A256 bit
B192 bit
A: 64 bit moreMemory speed
A16 Gbps
B19 Gbps
B: 3 Gbps moreMemory bandwidth
A512 GB/s
B456 GB/s
A: 56 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A225 W (TBP)
B190 W (TBP)
A: 35 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 4.0 x16
BPCIe 4.0 x8
differs
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do Intel Arc A750 Graphics and Intel Arc B580 Graphics have?
Intel Arc A750 Graphics: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus. Intel Arc B580 Graphics: 12 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus.
Which PCIe interface do the cards use?
Intel Arc A750 Graphics: PCIe 4.0 x16. Intel Arc B580 Graphics: PCIe 4.0 x8.
Which is faster: Intel Arc A750 Graphics or Intel Arc B580 Graphics?
It depends on the task: rendering and compute: results disagree.
See also
Data sources (3)
- Intel — specifications of Intel Arc A750 Graphics, specifications of Intel Arc B580 Graphicschecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.