Skip to content
RU

Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: specs and benchmark comparison

AAMD · Zen 4

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

  • 8 cores / 16 threads
  • up to 5.1 GHz
  • FP7, FP7r2, FP8

2023

BAMD · Zen 5

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

  • 12 cores / 24 threads
  • up to 5.1 GHz
  • FP8

Short verdict

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Compare with AI
← Ryzen 7 7840HSRyzen AI 9 HX 370 →

  • Multi-thread performance

    B +40.8%

    AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 leads in this scenario (up to 40.8% in comparable benchmarks).

No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where Ryzen 7 7840HS is better0

No advantages found in our data.

Where Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is better5

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 40.8% faster302 samples/min vs 215 samples/min

  • Cores 4 more12 vs 8

  • Threads 8 more24 vs 16

  • L2 cache 4 MB more12 MB vs 8 MB

  • L3 cache 8 MB more24 MB vs 16 MB

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

    CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

    B ahead by 40.8%

    Position among tested models (89)

    A · 215B · 302
    0200400600800
    Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

    AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is ahead by 40.8% in this benchmark.

    About the measurement and source
    A · AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

    214.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 54 · November 15, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 54 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 201.79–230.41; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-10-23; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.

    B · AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

    302.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 67 · November 15, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 67 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 285.49–312.45; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-03-09; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Other comparable benchmarks (3)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom206.8280.3B +35.5%
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom206.5290.1B +40.5%
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom213.1288.7B +35.4%

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Reference results (12)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom238.1325.7reference
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom217.6297.6reference
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom244.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom255—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom238.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom169.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom224.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom227.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom216.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom229.1293.4reference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom239.7305.6reference
Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—305.4no pair

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.

Cores and clocks

  • Cores

    A8

    B12

    B: 4 more

    Cores of different types may differ in performance.

  • Threads

    A16

    B24

    B: 8 more

  • Base clock

    A3.8 GHz

    B2 GHz

    A: 1.8 GHz more

    For hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.

  • Max clock (Boost/Turbo)

    A5.1 GHz

    B5.1 GHz

    equal

Cache

  • L1 cache

    A512 KB

    Bno data

    no data for B

  • L2 cache

    A8 MB

    B12 MB

    B: 4 MB more

  • L3 cache

    A16 MB

    B24 MB

    B: 8 MB more

Platform

  • Socket

    AFP7, FP7r2, FP8

    BFP8

    differs

  • Process node

    ATSMC 4 nm FinFET

    BTSMC 4 nm FinFET

    equal

Memory and interfaces

  • Memory type

    ADDR5, LPDDR5x

    BDDR5, LPDDR5x

    equal

  • Memory channels

    A2

    B2

    equal

  • Official memory speed

    A5,600 MT/s

    B5,600 MT/s

    equal

    For controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.

  • Max memory capacity

    A256 GB

    B256 GB

    equal

  • PCI Express

    APCIe 4.0

    BPCIe 4.0

    equal

  • Integrated graphics

    AAMD Radeon 780M

    BAMD Radeon 890M

    differs

Power

  • TDP (AMD method)

    A35–54 W

    B28 W (configurable: 15–54 W)

    not directly comparable

    AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

Do AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 fit the same motherboard?

No: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS uses FP7, FP7r2, FP8, while AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses FP8.

How many cores and threads do AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 have?

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: 8 cores / 16 threads. AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: 12 cores / 24 threads (manufacturer data).

Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: AMD Radeon 780M. AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: AMD Radeon 890M.

Which is faster: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS or AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370?

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Data sources (2)
  • AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, specifications of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370checked November 7, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK