Ryzen 5 7640U vs Ryzen 7 7735HS: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 7640U leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIMulti-thread performance
A +6.1%AMD Ryzen 5 7640U leads in this scenario (up to 6.1% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Ryzen 5 7640U is better4
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 6.1% faster172 samples/min vs 162 samples/min
L2 cache 2 MB more6 MB vs 4 MB
Official memory speed 800 MT/s more5,600 MT/s vs 4,800 MT/s
Max memory capacity 192 GB more256 GB vs 64 GB
Where Ryzen 7 7735HS is better2
Cores 2 more8 vs 6
Threads 4 more16 vs 12
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
- A ahead by 6.1%
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0
CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better
Ryzen 5 7640U172.2 samples/minRyzen 7 7735HS162.2 samples/minPosition among tested models (84)
B · 162A · 1720200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. AMD Ryzen 5 7640U is ahead by 6.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · AMD Ryzen 5 7640U
172.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 447 · November 15, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 447 submissions (37 outliers excluded), interquartile range 171.93–172.43; submissions 2024-08-03 to 2024-10-14; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.
- B · AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
162.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 32 · November 15, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 32 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 139.45–175.47; submissions 2024-07-21 to 2025-09-17; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Reference results (13)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 181.6 | 174.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 150.1 | 195.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 176.6 | 176 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 127.6 | 172 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 106.7 | 191.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 140.8 | 182.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 182 | 159.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 167.1 | 169.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 154.5 | 153.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 156.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 214.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 186.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 178 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.
| Specification | A · Ryzen 5 7640U | B · Ryzen 7 7735HS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores and clocks | |||
| CoresCores of different types may differ in performance. | 6 | 8 | B: 2 more |
| Threads | 12 | 16 | B: 4 more |
| Base clockFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown. | 3.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz | A: 0.3 GHz more |
| Max clock (Boost/Turbo) | 4.9 GHz | 4.75 GHz | A: 0.15 GHz more |
| Cache | |||
| L1 cache | no data | 512 KB | no data for A |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB | A: 2 MB more |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB | equal |
| Platform | |||
| Socket | FP7, FP7r2, FP8 | FP7 | differs |
| Process node | TSMC 4 nm FinFET | TSMC 6 nm FinFET | differs |
| Memory and interfaces | |||
| Memory type | DDR5, LPDDR5x | DDR5, LPDDR5 | differs |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 | equal |
| Official memory speedFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown. | 5,600 MT/s | 4,800 MT/s | A: 800 MT/s more |
| Max memory capacity | 256 GB | 64 GB | A: 192 GB more |
| PCI Express | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 | equal |
| Integrated graphics | AMD Radeon 760M | AMD Radeon 680M | differs |
| Power | |||
| TDP (AMD method)AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP. | 28 W (configurable: 15–30 W) | 35–54 W | not directly comparable |
Cores and clocks
Cores
A6
B8
B: 2 moreCores of different types may differ in performance.
Threads
A12
B16
B: 4 moreBase clock
A3.5 GHz
B3.2 GHz
A: 0.3 GHz moreFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.
Max clock (Boost/Turbo)
A4.9 GHz
B4.75 GHz
A: 0.15 GHz more
Cache
L1 cache
Ano data
B512 KB
no data for AL2 cache
A6 MB
B4 MB
A: 2 MB moreL3 cache
A16 MB
B16 MB
equal
Platform
Socket
AFP7, FP7r2, FP8
BFP7
differsProcess node
ATSMC 4 nm FinFET
BTSMC 6 nm FinFET
differs
Memory and interfaces
Memory type
ADDR5, LPDDR5x
BDDR5, LPDDR5
differsMemory channels
A2
B2
equalOfficial memory speed
A5,600 MT/s
B4,800 MT/s
A: 800 MT/s moreFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.
Max memory capacity
A256 GB
B64 GB
A: 192 GB morePCI Express
APCIe 4.0
BPCIe 4.0
equalIntegrated graphics
AAMD Radeon 760M
BAMD Radeon 680M
differs
Power
TDP (AMD method)
A28 W (configurable: 15–30 W)
B35–54 W
not directly comparableAMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Do AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS fit the same motherboard?
No: AMD Ryzen 5 7640U uses FP7, FP7r2, FP8, while AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS uses FP7.
How many cores and threads do AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS have?
AMD Ryzen 5 7640U: 6 cores / 12 threads. AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: 8 cores / 16 threads (manufacturer data).
Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?
AMD Ryzen 5 7640U: AMD Radeon 760M. AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: AMD Radeon 680M.
Which is faster: AMD Ryzen 5 7640U or AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS?
AMD Ryzen 5 7640U leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 5 7640U, specifications of AMD Ryzen 7 7735HSchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.