Ryzen 7 7435HS vs Ryzen 7 7735HS: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIMulti-thread performance
A +8.4%AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS leads in this scenario (up to 8.4% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Ryzen 7 7435HS is better1
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 8.4% faster189 samples/min vs 175 samples/min
Where Ryzen 7 7735HS is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
- A ahead by 8.4%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better
Ryzen 7 7435HS189.4 samples/minRyzen 7 7735HS174.7 samples/minPosition among tested models (89)
B · 175A · 1890200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS is ahead by 8.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS
189.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 75 · November 15, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 75 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 165.99–223.3; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-07-19; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.
- B · AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
174.7 samples/min · community measurement, sample 66 · November 15, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 66 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 142.6–192.93; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-08-13; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (3)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 170.5 | 162.2 | A +5.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 164.3 | 159.7 | A +2.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 174.5 | 169.9 | A +2.7% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (10)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 161.1 | 195.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 180.2 | 176 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 188.2 | 186.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 113.7 | 178 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 178.2 | 153.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 156.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 214.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 172 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 191.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 182.8 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.
| Specification | A · Ryzen 7 7435HS | B · Ryzen 7 7735HS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores and clocks | |||
| CoresCores of different types may differ in performance. | 8 | 8 | equal |
| Threads | 16 | 16 | equal |
| Base clockFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown. | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz | B: 0.1 GHz more |
| Max clock (Boost/Turbo) | 4.5 GHz | 4.75 GHz | B: 0.25 GHz more |
| Cache | |||
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB | equal |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | equal |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB | equal |
| Platform | |||
| Socket | FP7r2 | FP7 | differs |
| Process node | TSMC 6 nm FinFET | TSMC 6 nm FinFET | equal |
| Memory and interfaces | |||
| Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5 | differs |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 | equal |
| Official memory speedFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown. | 4,800 MT/s | 4,800 MT/s | equal |
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB | equal |
| PCI Express | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 | equal |
| Integrated graphics | none | AMD Radeon 680M | differs |
| Power | |||
| TDP (AMD method)AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP. | 45 W (configurable: 35–54 W) | 35–54 W | not directly comparable |
Cores and clocks
Cores
A8
B8
equalCores of different types may differ in performance.
Threads
A16
B16
equalBase clock
A3.1 GHz
B3.2 GHz
B: 0.1 GHz moreFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.
Max clock (Boost/Turbo)
A4.5 GHz
B4.75 GHz
B: 0.25 GHz more
Cache
L1 cache
A512 KB
B512 KB
equalL2 cache
A4 MB
B4 MB
equalL3 cache
A16 MB
B16 MB
equal
Platform
Socket
AFP7r2
BFP7
differsProcess node
ATSMC 6 nm FinFET
BTSMC 6 nm FinFET
equal
Memory and interfaces
Memory type
ADDR5
BDDR5, LPDDR5
differsMemory channels
A2
B2
equalOfficial memory speed
A4,800 MT/s
B4,800 MT/s
equalFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.
Max memory capacity
A64 GB
B64 GB
equalPCI Express
APCIe 4.0
BPCIe 4.0
equalIntegrated graphics
Anone
BAMD Radeon 680M
differs
Power
TDP (AMD method)
A45 W (configurable: 35–54 W)
B35–54 W
not directly comparableAMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Do AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS and AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS fit the same motherboard?
No: AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS uses FP7r2, while AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS uses FP7.
How many cores and threads do AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS and AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS have?
AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS: 8 cores / 16 threads. AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: 8 cores / 16 threads (manufacturer data).
Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?
AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS: no. AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: AMD Radeon 680M.
Which is faster: AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS or AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS?
AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS, specifications of AMD Ryzen 7 7735HSchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.