Ryzen 5 7500F vs Ryzen 7 7435HS: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIMulti-thread performance
A +15%AMD Ryzen 5 7500F leads in this scenario (up to 15% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Ryzen 5 7500F is better4
L2 cache 2 MB more6 MB vs 4 MB
L3 cache 16 MB more32 MB vs 16 MB
Official memory speed 400 MT/s more5,200 MT/s vs 4,800 MT/s
Max memory capacity 64 GB more128 GB vs 64 GB
Where Ryzen 7 7435HS is better3
Cores 2 more8 vs 6
Threads 4 more16 vs 12
L1 cache 128 KB more512 KB vs 384 KB
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
- 2.7% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better
Ryzen 5 7500F194.5 samples/minRyzen 7 7435HS189.4 samples/minPosition among tested models (89)
B · 189A · 1940200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. The 2.7% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
194.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 84 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 84 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 185.37–200.76; submissions 2025-07-21 to 2026-08-25; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS
189.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 75 · November 15, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 75 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 165.99–223.3; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-07-19; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (3)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 191.8 | 170.5 | A +12.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 189 | 164.3 | A +15% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 192.7 | 174.5 | A +10.4% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (8)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 211.5 | 161.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 219.3 | 180.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 208.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 199.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 209.1 | 113.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 189.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 202.9 | 178.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 188.2 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.
| Specification | A · Ryzen 5 7500F | B · Ryzen 7 7435HS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores and clocks | |||
| CoresCores of different types may differ in performance. | 6 | 8 | B: 2 more |
| Threads | 12 | 16 | B: 4 more |
| Base clockFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown. | 3.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz | A: 0.6 GHz more |
| Max clock (Boost/Turbo) | 5 GHz | 4.5 GHz | A: 0.5 GHz more |
| Unlocked multiplier | yes | no data | no data for B |
| Cache | |||
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 512 KB | B: 128 KB more |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB | A: 2 MB more |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 16 MB | A: 16 MB more |
| Platform | |||
| Socket | AM5 | FP7r2 | differs |
| Process node | TSMC 5 nm FinFET | TSMC 6 nm FinFET | differs |
| Memory and interfaces | |||
| Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | equal |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 | equal |
| Official memory speedFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown. | 5,200 MT/s | 4,800 MT/s | A: 400 MT/s more |
| Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB | A: 64 GB more |
| PCI Express | PCIe 5.0, 24 lanes | PCIe 4.0 | differs |
| Integrated graphics | none | none | equal |
| Power | |||
| TDP (AMD method)AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP. | 65 W | 45 W (configurable: 35–54 W) | not directly comparable |
Cores and clocks
Cores
A6
B8
B: 2 moreCores of different types may differ in performance.
Threads
A12
B16
B: 4 moreBase clock
A3.7 GHz
B3.1 GHz
A: 0.6 GHz moreFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.
Max clock (Boost/Turbo)
A5 GHz
B4.5 GHz
A: 0.5 GHz moreUnlocked multiplier
Ayes
Bno data
no data for B
Cache
L1 cache
A384 KB
B512 KB
B: 128 KB moreL2 cache
A6 MB
B4 MB
A: 2 MB moreL3 cache
A32 MB
B16 MB
A: 16 MB more
Platform
Socket
AAM5
BFP7r2
differsProcess node
ATSMC 5 nm FinFET
BTSMC 6 nm FinFET
differs
Memory and interfaces
Memory type
ADDR5
BDDR5
equalMemory channels
A2
B2
equalOfficial memory speed
A5,200 MT/s
B4,800 MT/s
A: 400 MT/s moreFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.
Max memory capacity
A128 GB
B64 GB
A: 64 GB morePCI Express
APCIe 5.0, 24 lanes
BPCIe 4.0
differsIntegrated graphics
Anone
Bnone
equal
Power
TDP (AMD method)
A65 W
B45 W (configurable: 35–54 W)
not directly comparableAMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Do AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS fit the same motherboard?
No: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F uses AM5, while AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS uses FP7r2.
How many cores and threads do AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS have?
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F: 6 cores / 12 threads. AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS: 8 cores / 16 threads (manufacturer data).
Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F: no. AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS: no.
Which is faster: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F or AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS?
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, specifications of AMD Ryzen 7 7435HSchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.