Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ryzen 7 7435HS: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIMulti-thread performance
A +33.7%Intel Core Ultra 9 185H leads in this scenario (up to 33.7% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Core Ultra 9 185H is better6
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 9.1% faster207 samples/min vs 189 samples/min
Cores 8 more16 (6P + 10E) vs 8
Threads 6 more22 vs 16
L3 cache 8 MB more24 MB vs 16 MB
Official memory speed 800 MT/s more5,600 MT/s vs 4,800 MT/s
Max memory capacity 32 GB more96 GB vs 64 GB
Where Ryzen 7 7435HS is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
- A ahead by 9.1%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better
Core Ultra 9 185H206.7 samples/minRyzen 7 7435HS189.4 samples/minPosition among tested models (89)
B · 189A · 2070200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is ahead by 9.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
206.7 samples/min · community measurement, sample 32 · November 15, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 32 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 172.4–225.43; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-03-08; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.
- B · AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS
189.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 75 · November 15, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 75 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 165.99–223.3; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-07-19; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (3)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 218.1 | 170.5 | A +28% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 206.9 | 164.3 | A +25.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 233.2 | 174.5 | A +33.7% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (8)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 178.6 | 161.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 237.8 | 180.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 196.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 236.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 208.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 185 | 113.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 188.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 178.2 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.
| Specification | A · Core Ultra 9 185H | B · Ryzen 7 7435HS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores and clocks | |||
| CoresCores of different types may differ in performance. | 16 (6P + 10E) | 8 | A: 8 more |
| Threads | 22 | 16 | A: 6 more |
| Base clockFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown. | 2.3 GHz | 3.1 GHz | B: 0.8 GHz more |
| Max clock (Boost/Turbo) | 5.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz | A: 0.6 GHz more |
| Cache | |||
| L1 cache | no data | 512 KB | no data for A |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB | no data for A |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 16 MB | A: 8 MB more |
| Platform | |||
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FP7r2 | differs |
| Process node | no data | TSMC 6 nm FinFET | no data for A |
| Memory and interfaces | |||
| Memory type | DDR5, LPDDR5/x | DDR5 | differs |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 | equal |
| Official memory speedFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown. | 5,600 MT/s | 4,800 MT/s | A: 800 MT/s more |
| Max memory capacity | 96 GB | 64 GB | A: 32 GB more |
| PCI Express | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 28 lanes | PCIe 4.0 | differs |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Arc graphics | none | differs |
| Power | |||
| TDP (AMD method)AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP. | no data | 45 W (configurable: 35–54 W) | no data for A |
| Processor Base Power (Intel) | 45 W | no data | no data for B |
| Maximum Turbo Power (Intel) | 115 W | no data | no data for B |
| Minimum Assured Power (Intel)The lower bound to which the laptop maker can reduce the CPU’s base power. | 35 W | no data | no data for B |
Cores and clocks
Cores
A16 (6P + 10E)
B8
A: 8 moreCores of different types may differ in performance.
Threads
A22
B16
A: 6 moreBase clock
A2.3 GHz
B3.1 GHz
B: 0.8 GHz moreFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.
Max clock (Boost/Turbo)
A5.1 GHz
B4.5 GHz
A: 0.6 GHz more
Cache
L1 cache
Ano data
B512 KB
no data for AL2 cache
Ano data
B4 MB
no data for AL3 cache
A24 MB
B16 MB
A: 8 MB more
Platform
Socket
AFCBGA2049
BFP7r2
differsProcess node
Ano data
BTSMC 6 nm FinFET
no data for A
Memory and interfaces
Memory type
ADDR5, LPDDR5/x
BDDR5
differsMemory channels
A2
B2
equalOfficial memory speed
A5,600 MT/s
B4,800 MT/s
A: 800 MT/s moreFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.
Max memory capacity
A96 GB
B64 GB
A: 32 GB morePCI Express
APCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 28 lanes
BPCIe 4.0
differsIntegrated graphics
AIntel Arc graphics
Bnone
differs
Power
TDP (AMD method)
Ano data
B45 W (configurable: 35–54 W)
no data for AAMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.
Processor Base Power (Intel)
A45 W
Bno data
no data for BMaximum Turbo Power (Intel)
A115 W
Bno data
no data for BMinimum Assured Power (Intel)
A35 W
Bno data
no data for BThe lower bound to which the laptop maker can reduce the CPU’s base power.
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Do Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS fit the same motherboard?
No: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H uses FCBGA2049, while AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS uses FP7r2.
How many cores and threads do Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS have?
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: 16 cores / 22 threads. AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS: 8 cores / 16 threads (manufacturer data).
Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Intel Arc graphics. AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS: no.
Which is faster: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H or AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS?
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- Intel — specifications of Intel Core Ultra 9 185Hchecked November 7, 2026
- AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 7 7435HSchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.