Skip to content
RU

Core i7-13700H vs Ryzen 7 7735HS: specs and benchmark comparison

AIntel · Raptor Lake

Intel Core i7-13700H

  • 14 cores / 20 threads
  • up to 5 GHz
  • FCBGA1744

2023

BAMD · Zen 3+

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

  • 8 cores / 16 threads
  • up to 4.75 GHz
  • FP7

2023

Short verdict

Intel Core i7-13700H leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Compare with AI
← Core i7-13700HRyzen 7 7735HS →

  • Multi-thread performance

    A +21.1%

    Intel Core i7-13700H leads in this scenario (up to 21.1% in comparable benchmarks).

No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where Core i7-13700H is better5

  • Cores 6 more14 (6P + 8E) vs 8

  • Threads 4 more20 vs 16

  • L3 cache 8 MB more24 MB vs 16 MB

  • Official memory speed 400 MT/s more5,200 MT/s vs 4,800 MT/s

  • Max memory capacity 32 GB more96 GB vs 64 GB

Where Ryzen 7 7735HS is better0

No advantages found in our data.

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

    CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

    1.6% difference, within the threshold

    Position among tested models (89)

    B · 175A · 178
    0200400600800
    Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

    The 1.6% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).

    About the measurement and source
    A · Intel Core i7-13700H

    177.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 37 · November 15, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 37 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 140.52–194.2; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-03-05; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.

    B · AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

    174.7 samples/min · community measurement, sample 66 · November 15, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 66 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 142.6–192.93; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-08-13; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Other comparable benchmarks (5)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom196.4162.2A +21.1%
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom217.4191.7A +13.4%
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom182182.8B +0.5%
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom162.3159.7A +1.6%
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom167.9169.9B +1.2%

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Reference results (9)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom189.2195.2reference
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom177176reference
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom158.3156.9reference
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom249.9214.2reference
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom240.8172reference
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom220186.6reference
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom180.2178reference
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom112.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom180.1153.9reference

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.

Cores and clocks

  • Cores

    A14 (6P + 8E)

    B8

    A: 6 more

    Cores of different types may differ in performance.

  • Threads

    A20

    B16

    A: 4 more

  • Base clock

    Ano data

    B3.2 GHz

    no data for A

    For hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.

  • Max clock (Boost/Turbo)

    A5 GHz

    B4.75 GHz

    A: 0.25 GHz more

Cache

  • L1 cache

    Ano data

    B512 KB

    no data for A

  • L2 cache

    Ano data

    B4 MB

    no data for A

  • L3 cache

    A24 MB

    B16 MB

    A: 8 MB more

Platform

  • Socket

    AFCBGA1744

    BFP7

    differs

  • Process node

    AIntel 7

    BTSMC 6 nm FinFET

    differs

Memory and interfaces

  • Memory type

    ADDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4x, LPDDR5/x

    BDDR5, LPDDR5

    differs

  • Memory channels

    A2

    B2

    equal

  • Official memory speed

    A5,200 MT/s

    B4,800 MT/s

    A: 400 MT/s more

    For controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.

  • Max memory capacity

    A96 GB

    B64 GB

    A: 32 GB more

  • PCI Express

    APCIe 5.0, 28 lanes

    BPCIe 4.0

    differs

  • Integrated graphics

    AIntel Iris Xe Graphics (eligible)

    BAMD Radeon 680M

    differs

Power

  • TDP (AMD method)

    Ano data

    B35–54 W

    no data for A

    AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.

  • Processor Base Power (Intel)

    A45 W

    Bno data

    no data for B

  • Maximum Turbo Power (Intel)

    A115 W

    Bno data

    no data for B

  • Minimum Assured Power (Intel)

    A35 W

    Bno data

    no data for B

    The lower bound to which the laptop maker can reduce the CPU’s base power.

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

Do Intel Core i7-13700H and AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS fit the same motherboard?

No: Intel Core i7-13700H uses FCBGA1744, while AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS uses FP7.

How many cores and threads do Intel Core i7-13700H and AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS have?

Intel Core i7-13700H: 14 cores / 20 threads. AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: 8 cores / 16 threads (manufacturer data).

Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

Intel Core i7-13700H: Intel Iris Xe Graphics (eligible). AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: AMD Radeon 680M.

Which is faster: Intel Core i7-13700H or AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS?

Intel Core i7-13700H leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Data sources (3)
  • Intel — specifications of Intel Core i7-13700Hchecked November 7, 2026
  • AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 7 7735HSchecked November 7, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK