Skip to content
RU

Apple M3 Ultra vs Ryzen 9 7950X: specs and benchmark comparison

AApple · ARM64

Apple M3 Ultra

    2025

    BAMD · Zen 4

    AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

    • 16 cores / 32 threads
    • up to 5.7 GHz
    • AM5

    September 27, 2022 · $699 at launch

    Short verdict

    Apple M3 Ultra leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

    Compare with AI
    ← Apple M3 UltraRyzen 9 7950X →
    • Multi-thread performance

      A +30%

      Apple M3 Ultra leads in this scenario (up to 30% in comparable benchmarks).

    No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

    Advantages

    Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

    Where Apple M3 Ultra is better2

    • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 30% faster716 samples/min vs 551 samples/min

    • Max memory capacity 384 GB more512 GB vs 128 GB

    Where Ryzen 9 7950X is better0

    No advantages found in our data.

    Benchmarks

    Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

    • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

      CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

      A ahead by 30%

      Position among tested models (89)

      B · 551A · 716
      0200400600800
      Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

      Apple M3 Ultra is ahead by 30% in this benchmark.

      About the measurement and source
      A · Apple M3 Ultra

      716.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 27 · November 14, 2026

      Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

      Median of 27 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 709.3–806.66; submissions 2025-07-22 to 2026-03-05; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

      B · AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

      551.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 232 · November 14, 2026

      Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

      Median of 232 submissions (14 outliers excluded), interquartile range 529.77–587.25; submissions 2025-07-19 to 2026-03-08; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

      difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

      Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

    Reference results (15)
    BenchmarkABDifference
    Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom809.1585.5reference
    Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom679575.3reference
    Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom698.2551.9reference
    Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom695.3522.4reference
    Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom806.1535reference
    Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom696.1518reference
    Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom698.3588reference
    Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—527.9no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—576.1no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—619.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—588.8no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—566.9no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—569.1no pair
    Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—550.1no pair
    Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—570.5no pair

    Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

    Specifications

    Cores and clocks

    • Cores

      Ano data

      B16

      no data for A

      Cores of different types may differ in performance.

    • Threads

      Ano data

      B32

      no data for A
    • Base clock

      Ano data

      B4.5 GHz

      no data for A

      For hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.

    • Max clock (Boost/Turbo)

      Ano data

      B5.7 GHz

      no data for A
    • Unlocked multiplier

      Ano data

      Byes

      no data for A

    Cache

    • L1 cache

      Ano data

      B1,024 KB

      no data for A
    • L2 cache

      Ano data

      B16 MB

      no data for A
    • L3 cache

      Ano data

      B64 MB

      no data for A

    Platform

    • Socket

      Ano data

      BAM5

      no data for A
    • Process node

      A3 nm

      BTSMC 5 nm FinFET

      differs

    Memory and interfaces

    • Memory type

      AUnified memory

      BDDR5

      differs
    • Memory channels

      Ano data

      B2

      no data for A
    • Official memory speed

      Ano data

      B5,200 MT/s

      no data for A

      For controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.

    • Max memory capacity

      A512 GB

      B128 GB

      A: 384 GB more
    • PCI Express

      Ano data

      BPCIe 5.0, 24 lanes

      no data for A
    • Integrated graphics

      AApple M3 Ultra (60 / 80-core GPU)

      BAMD Radeon Graphics (2 CU)

      differs

    Power

    • TDP (AMD method)

      Ano data

      B170 W

      no data for A

      AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.

    “More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

    Compare with AI

    An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

    AI verdict

    Questions and answers

    Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

    Apple M3 Ultra: Apple M3 Ultra (60 / 80-core GPU). AMD Ryzen 9 7950X: AMD Radeon Graphics (2 CU).

    Which is faster: Apple M3 Ultra or AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

    Apple M3 Ultra leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

    Data sources (4)
    • Apple — specifications of Apple M3 Ultrachecked November 14, 2026
    • AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 9 7950Xchecked November 7, 2026
    • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
    • Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026

    How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

    TelegramVK