Skip to content
RU

Apple M1 vs Apple M5 Pro (18-core CPU): specs and benchmark comparison

AApple · ARM64

Apple M1

  • 8 cores

2020

BApple · ARM64

Apple M5 Pro (18-core CPU)

  • 18 cores

2026

Short verdict

Apple M5 Pro (18-core CPU) leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Compare with AI
← Apple M1Apple M5 Pro (18-core CPU) →
  • Multi-thread performance

    B +526.3%

    Apple M5 Pro (18-core CPU) leads in this scenario (up to 526.3% in comparable benchmarks).

No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where Apple M1 is better0

No advantages found in our data.

Where Apple M5 Pro (18-core CPU) is better2

  • Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 474.2% faster560 samples/min vs 98 samples/min

  • Cores 10 more18 vs 8 (4P + 4E)

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

  • Blender Benchmark 5.2.0

    CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

    B ahead by 474.2%

    Position among tested models (49)

    A · 98B · 560
    0200400600800
    Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

    Apple M5 Pro (18-core CPU) is ahead by 474.2% in this benchmark.

    About the measurement and source
    A · Apple M1

    97.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 29 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 87.14–116.67; submissions 2026-07-23 to 2026-11-04; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    B · Apple M5 Pro (18-core CPU)

    560.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 32 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 32 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 525.76–574.78; submissions 2026-07-21 to 2026-11-08; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Other comparable benchmarks (2)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom90.4566.3B +526.3%
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom90.7556.4B +513.3%

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Reference results (17)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom92.7522reference
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom95.4545.5reference
Blender Benchmark 3.0.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom99.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom92.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.2CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom91.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom112.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom92.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom100.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom95.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom94.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom95.5519.9reference
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom95.8529.5reference
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom94.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom93.7516.3reference
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom94.2528.6reference
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom92.9587.4reference
Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—509.7no pair

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Cores and clocks

  • Cores

    A8 (4P + 4E)

    B18

    B: 10 more

    Cores of different types may differ in performance.

Platform

  • Process node

    A5 nm

    B3 nm

    differs

Memory and interfaces

  • Memory type

    AUnified memory

    BUnified memory

    equal
  • Max memory capacity

    A16 GB

    Bno data

    no data for B
  • Integrated graphics

    AApple M1 (7 / 8-core GPU)

    BApple M5 Pro (16 / 20-core GPU)

    differs

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

Apple M1: Apple M1 (7 / 8-core GPU). Apple M5 Pro (18-core CPU): Apple M5 Pro (16 / 20-core GPU).

Which is faster: Apple M1 or Apple M5 Pro (18-core CPU)?

Apple M5 Pro (18-core CPU) leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Data sources (2)
  • Apple — specifications of Apple M1, specifications of Apple M5 Pro (18-core CPU)checked November 14, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK