Apple M1 vs Apple M2: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
Apple M2 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIMulti-thread performance
B +42.9%Apple M2 leads in this scenario (up to 42.9% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Apple M1 is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where Apple M2 is better2
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 17.1% faster112 samples/min vs 95 samples/min
Max memory capacity 8 GB more24 GB vs 16 GB
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 17.1%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better
Apple M195.4 samples/minApple M2111.7 samples/minPosition among tested models (89)
A · 95B · 1120200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. Apple M2 is ahead by 17.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · Apple M1
95.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 104 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 104 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 88.14–115.06; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-10-03; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · Apple M2
111.7 samples/min · community measurement, sample 62 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 62 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 102.8–142.23; submissions 2025-07-19 to 2026-03-05; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (11)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 92.7 | 105.5 | B +13.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 97.6 | 102 | B +4.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 92.7 | 132.6 | B +42.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 100.5 | 113.5 | B +13% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 95.8 | 116.6 | B +21.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 94.4 | 108.6 | B +15.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 95.5 | 110.4 | B +15.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 95.8 | 109.2 | B +14.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 94.7 | 107.4 | B +13.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 93.7 | 107.4 | B +14.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 94.2 | 107.5 | B +14.1% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (7)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 90.4 | 104.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 99.7 | 106.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 92.5 | 105 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 91.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 112.3 | 143.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 92.9 | 103.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 90.7 | 104.9 | reference |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · Apple M1 | B · Apple M2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores and clocks | |||
| CoresCores of different types may differ in performance. | 8 (4P + 4E) | 8 (4P + 4E) | equal |
| Platform | |||
| Process node | 5 nm | 5 nm | equal |
| Memory and interfaces | |||
| Memory type | Unified memory | Unified memory | equal |
| Max memory capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB | B: 8 GB more |
| Integrated graphics | Apple M1 (7 / 8-core GPU) | Apple M2 (8 / 10-core GPU) | differs |
Cores and clocks
Cores
A8 (4P + 4E)
B8 (4P + 4E)
equalCores of different types may differ in performance.
Platform
Process node
A5 nm
B5 nm
equal
Memory and interfaces
Memory type
AUnified memory
BUnified memory
equalMax memory capacity
A16 GB
B24 GB
B: 8 GB moreIntegrated graphics
AApple M1 (7 / 8-core GPU)
BApple M2 (8 / 10-core GPU)
differs
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?
Apple M1: Apple M1 (7 / 8-core GPU). Apple M2: Apple M2 (8 / 10-core GPU).
Which is faster: Apple M1 or Apple M2?
Apple M2 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Apple — specifications of Apple M1, specifications of Apple M2checked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.