Skip to content
RU

Apple M1 vs Apple M1 Ultra: specs and benchmark comparison

AApple · ARM64

Apple M1

  • 8 cores

2020

BApple · ARM64

Apple M1 Ultra

  • 20 cores

2022

Short verdict

Apple M1 Ultra leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Compare with AI
← Apple M1Apple M1 Ultra →
  • Multi-thread performance

    B +309.4%

    Apple M1 Ultra leads in this scenario (up to 309.4% in comparable benchmarks).

No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where Apple M1 is better0

No advantages found in our data.

Where Apple M1 Ultra is better3

  • Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 309.4% faster379 samples/min vs 93 samples/min

  • Cores 12 more20 (16P + 4E) vs 8 (4P + 4E)

  • Max memory capacity 112 GB more128 GB vs 16 GB

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

  • Blender Benchmark 3.1.0

    CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

    B ahead by 309.4%

    Position among tested models (19)

    A · 93B · 379
    0200400600
    Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

    Apple M1 Ultra is ahead by 309.4% in this benchmark.

    About the measurement and source
    A · Apple M1

    92.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 256 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 256 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 87.07–118.39; submissions 2022-03-09 to 2022-06-30; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    B · Apple M1 Ultra

    378.9 samples/min · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 42 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 376.38–380.41; submissions 2022-03-17 to 2022-07-04; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Reference results (18)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom92.7410.7reference
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom95.4433.5reference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom90.4415.2reference
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom97.6405.9reference
Blender Benchmark 3.0.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom99.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.2CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom91.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom112.3395reference
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom92.7389.8reference
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom100.5430reference
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom95.8412.2reference
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom94.4411reference
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom95.5416reference
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom95.8418.8reference
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom94.7417.9reference
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom93.7422.8reference
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom94.2409.7reference
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom92.9399.8reference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom90.7387.1reference

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Cores and clocks

  • Cores

    A8 (4P + 4E)

    B20 (16P + 4E)

    B: 12 more

    Cores of different types may differ in performance.

Platform

  • Process node

    A5 nm

    B5 nm

    equal

Memory and interfaces

  • Memory type

    AUnified memory

    BUnified memory

    equal
  • Max memory capacity

    A16 GB

    B128 GB

    B: 112 GB more
  • Integrated graphics

    AApple M1 (7 / 8-core GPU)

    BApple M1 Ultra (48 / 64-core GPU)

    differs

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

Apple M1: Apple M1 (7 / 8-core GPU). Apple M1 Ultra: Apple M1 Ultra (48 / 64-core GPU).

Which is faster: Apple M1 or Apple M1 Ultra?

Apple M1 Ultra leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Data sources (2)
  • Apple — specifications of Apple M1, specifications of Apple M1 Ultrachecked November 14, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK