Apple M1 Pro vs Apple M2 Ultra: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
Apple M2 Ultra leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIMulti-thread performance
B +195.6%Apple M2 Ultra leads in this scenario (up to 195.6% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Apple M1 Pro is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where Apple M2 Ultra is better2
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 195.6% faster502 samples/min vs 170 samples/min
Max memory capacity 160 GB more192 GB vs 32 GB
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 195.6%
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0
CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better
Apple M1 Pro169.9 samples/minApple M2 Ultra502.3 samples/minPosition among tested models (52)
A · 170B · 5020200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. Apple M2 Ultra is ahead by 195.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · Apple M1 Pro
169.9 samples/min · community measurement, sample 95 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 95 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 155.09–204.61; submissions 2023-06-29 to 2025-07-14; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · Apple M2 Ultra
502.3 samples/min · community measurement, sample 28 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 28 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 498.04–504.31; submissions 2023-06-30 to 2023-11-16; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Reference results (19)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 189.1 | 496 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 180.9 | 526 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 182.3 | 509.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 185.2 | 501.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 196.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 178.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 180.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 190.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 189.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 203.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 191.6 | 506.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 192 | 493.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 202.7 | 507.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 178.9 | 510.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 172.2 | 507.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 162 | 508.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 170.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 202.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 158.3 | — | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · Apple M1 Pro | B · Apple M2 Ultra | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores and clocks | |||
| CoresCores of different types may differ in performance. | no data | 24 (16P + 8E) | no data for A |
| Platform | |||
| Process node | 5 nm | 5 nm | equal |
| Memory and interfaces | |||
| Memory type | Unified memory | Unified memory | equal |
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 192 GB | B: 160 GB more |
| Integrated graphics | Apple M1 Pro (14 / 16-core GPU) | Apple M2 Ultra (60 / 76-core GPU) | differs |
Cores and clocks
Cores
Ano data
B24 (16P + 8E)
no data for ACores of different types may differ in performance.
Platform
Process node
A5 nm
B5 nm
equal
Memory and interfaces
Memory type
AUnified memory
BUnified memory
equalMax memory capacity
A32 GB
B192 GB
B: 160 GB moreIntegrated graphics
AApple M1 Pro (14 / 16-core GPU)
BApple M2 Ultra (60 / 76-core GPU)
differs
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?
Apple M1 Pro: Apple M1 Pro (14 / 16-core GPU). Apple M2 Ultra: Apple M2 Ultra (60 / 76-core GPU).
Which is faster: Apple M1 Pro or Apple M2 Ultra?
Apple M2 Ultra leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Apple — specifications of Apple M1 Pro, specifications of Apple M2 Ultrachecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.