Skip to content
RU

CPU rankings

Each table is one benchmark at one version. There is no overall score: different benchmarks measure different things.

Multi-thread performance

Blender Benchmark 3.4.0

CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · higher is better

Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation), November 14, 2026
#ModelChartsamples/minOf leaderAt launch
1Ryzen 9 7950X589100%$699
2Ryzen 9 7950X3D56796%$699
3Core i9-13900K55494%$589
4Ryzen 9 7900X44075%$549
5Core i7-13700K41470%$409
6Ryzen 9 5950X41070%$799
7Ryzen 9 790038565%$429
8Core i9-12900K37063%$589
9Core i5-13600K32255%$319
10Ryzen 9 5900X32054%$549
11Core i7-12700K30953%$409
12Ryzen 7 7700X28849%$399
13Apple M2 Max25443%—
14Apple M2 Pro (12-core CPU)25343%—
15Core i5-12600K23540%$289
16Ryzen 5 7600X22338%$299
17Ryzen 7 5800X21837%$449
18Ryzen 7 5800X3D21737%—
19Core i5-13400F21737%—
20Ryzen 5 760021436%$229
21Apple M1 Max20635%—
22Core i7-12700H20435%—
23Apple M1 Pro (10-core CPU)20334%—
24Apple M2 Pro20134%—
25Apple M2 Pro (10-core CPU)19834%—
26Apple M1 Pro19233%—
27Ryzen 7 5800H17229%—
28Core i5-12400F17029%$167
29Core i5-12500H16127%—
30Ryzen 5 5600X15927%$299
31Ryzen 5 560015827%—
32Apple M1 Pro (8-core CPU)15827%—
33Ryzen 5 5600H11820%—
34Apple M211720%—
35Core i3-12100F10918%—
36Apple M19616%—

No ranking data yet for: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

How the difference is calculated is explained in the methodology.