NVIDIA · Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max-Q: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 8 GB GDDR6
- 80 W
- Release
- April 2, 2020
- Power
- 80 W
- depends on the laptop model
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend. A laptop chip’s result depends on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
49.97 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (5)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 57.21 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 67.07 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 73.23 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 62.14 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 64.59 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
32.76 s
lower is better
Median of 6 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 30.34 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 37.3 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 32.49 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 33.64 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
183.53 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (5)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 205.1 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 217.13 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 215.08 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 202.06 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 206.07 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
124.69 s
lower is better
Median of 4 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 122.93 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 129.12 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 123.53 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 119.87 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
99.33 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (5)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 106.75 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 125.67 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 120.4 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 118.24 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 114.14 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
59.41 s
lower is better
Median of 4 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 60.51 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 49.77 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 54.37 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 53.15 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA)
163.94 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (5)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 175.34 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 207.31 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 198.42 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 201.48 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 189.55 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
125.31 s
lower is better
Median of 4 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 203.38 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 106.99 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 101.29 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 95.13 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
294.38 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (5)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 319.31 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 387.38 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 373.71 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 362.82 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 359.55 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
159.53 s
lower is better
Median of 4 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 153.84 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 142.81 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 163.1 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 160.95 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA)
424.95 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (5)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 477.88 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 480.7 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 464.45 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 481.85 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 472.24 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
217.37 s
lower is better
Median of 4 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 266.98 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 163.36 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 192.21 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 184.12 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
1,277 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 1,239 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 314 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
1,656 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (13)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 1,816 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 1,836 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 1,731 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 213 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 1,788 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 1,981 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 1,976 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 1,879 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 1,826 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 1,421 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 2,042 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 1,911 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 1,923 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit, clocks and memory in each laptop.
Chip
- GPU chip
- TU104
- Architecture
- Turing
- Shader units
- 2,560 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 930 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,155 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 8 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR6
- Memory bus
- 256 bit
- Memory bandwidth
- 448 GB/s
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 80 W (TDP)
- Interface
- PCIe 3.0 x16
Частоты and лимит мощности зависят от модели ноутбука.
Specifications: Wikipedia (English), checked November 14, 2026. Release date: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).