NVIDIA · Turing
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 4 GB GDDR5
- 30 W
- Release
- April 23, 2019
- Power
- 30 W
- depends on the laptop model
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend. A laptop chip’s result depends on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
158.74 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (6)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 159.34 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 192.59 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 175.89 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 178.41 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 162.8 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 160.59 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
1,229.46 s
lower is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 140.19 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 139.35 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
640.22 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (5)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 609.39 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 596.28 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 596.36 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 616.22 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 562.51 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.92
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
543.38 s
lower is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 528.87 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
1,317.33 s
lower is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (6)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 308.23 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 350.65 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 320.68 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 331.6 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 305.32 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 292.38 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.92
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
268.22 s
lower is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 261.34 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA)
2,124.25 s
lower is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (5)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 471.5 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 556.11 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 511.73 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 553.13 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 501.95 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
319.83 s
lower is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
939.95 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (5)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 922.19 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 1,091.4 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 1,020.43 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 1,077.75 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 960.82 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
774.14 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA)
6,208.87 s
lower is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (5)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 2,273.57 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 1,460.27 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 2,419.97 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 1,473.98 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 7,429.2 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
1,060.75 s
lower is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
457 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (9)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 443 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 453 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 320 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 352 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 437 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 431 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 353 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 416 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 429 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
362 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 7 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (18)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0 | 340 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 296 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 312 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 300 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0 | 364 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 374 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 369 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 382 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 135 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 395 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 404 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 428 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 393 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 394 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 383 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2 | 282 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 335 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 303 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit, clocks and memory in each laptop.
Chip
- Architecture
- Turing
- Shader units
- 1,024 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,020 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,245 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 4 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR5
- Memory bus
- 128 bit
- Memory bandwidth
- 112 GB/s
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 30 W (TDP)
- Interface
- PCIe 3.0 x16
Частоты and лимит мощности зависят от модели ноутбука.
Specifications: Wikipedia (English), checked November 14, 2026. Release date: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).