GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
A +33.6%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 leads in this scenario (up to 33.6% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 3070 is better14
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 8.4% lower27 s vs 29 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 5.1% lower16 s vs 17 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 17.7% lower114 s vs 134 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 15.3% lower53 s vs 62 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 13.6% lower56 s vs 64 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 17.2% lower33 s vs 38 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 13.9% lower93 s vs 106 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 22.2% lower67 s vs 82 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 15.7% lower154 s vs 178 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 10.9% lower74 s vs 82 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 15.5% lower226 s vs 262 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 19.4% lower102 s vs 122 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 15.9% faster3,198 samples/min vs 2,761 samples/min
Shader units 768 more5,888 (CUDA cores) vs 5,120 (CUDA cores)
Where GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
- A ahead by 8.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307026.5 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU28.7 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
A · 27B · 290100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 8.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
26.5 s · community measurement, sample 151 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 151 submissions (37 outliers excluded), interquartile range 26.29–26.91; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
28.7 s · community measurement, sample 116 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 116 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 27.25–32.03; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 5.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307016.4 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU17.3 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
A · 16B · 17050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 5.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
16.4 s · community measurement, sample 98 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 98 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 16.23–16.71; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
17.3 s · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 16.84–19.15; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 17.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3070114.1 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU134.3 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
A · 114B · 1340200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 17.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
114.1 s · community measurement, sample 134 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 134 submissions (26 outliers excluded), interquartile range 113.03–116.56; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
134.3 s · community measurement, sample 91 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 91 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 127.14–146.92; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 15.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307053.4 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU61.5 sPosition among tested models (14, OptiX)
A · 53B · 62050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 15.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
53.4 s · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 52.53–54.52; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61.5 s · community measurement, sample 87 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 87 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 59.14–66.25; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 13.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307056 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU63.7 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
A · 56B · 640100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 13.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
56 s · community measurement, sample 112 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 112 submissions (23 outliers excluded), interquartile range 55.47–57.13; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
63.7 s · community measurement, sample 70 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 70 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 61–70.98; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 17.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307032.6 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU38.2 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
A · 33B · 38020406080Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 17.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
32.6 s · community measurement, sample 87 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 87 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 32.13–33.58; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
38.2 s · community measurement, sample 73 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 73 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 36.93–40.92; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 13.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307092.7 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU105.5 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
A · 93B · 1060200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 13.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
92.7 s · community measurement, sample 110 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 110 submissions (23 outliers excluded), interquartile range 91.73–94.24; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
105.5 s · community measurement, sample 64 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 64 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 100.91–115.04; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 22.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307067 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU81.9 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
A · 67B · 82050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 22.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
67 s · community measurement, sample 78 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 78 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 65.96–68.84; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
81.9 s · community measurement, sample 66 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 66 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 79.76–87.28; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 15.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3070154.3 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU178.5 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
A · 154B · 1780200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 15.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
154.3 s · community measurement, sample 109 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 109 submissions (24 outliers excluded), interquartile range 152.83–157.43; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
178.5 s · community measurement, sample 74 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 74 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 169.45–196.61; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 10.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307074.4 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU82.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
A · 74B · 820100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 10.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
74.4 s · community measurement, sample 84 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 84 submissions (12 outliers excluded), interquartile range 73.58–75.64; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
82.5 s · community measurement, sample 78 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 78 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 80.04–88.43; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 15.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3070226.4 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU261.6 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
A · 226B · 26202505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 15.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
226.4 s · community measurement, sample 109 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 109 submissions (20 outliers excluded), interquartile range 223.23–229.38; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
261.6 s · community measurement, sample 66 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 66 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 249.25–285.23; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 19.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3070101.7 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU121.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
A · 102B · 1220100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 19.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
101.7 s · community measurement, sample 85 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 85 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 99.6–104.68; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
121.5 s · community measurement, sample 70 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 70 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 117.1–128.44; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 15.9%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 30703,198.3 samples/minGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU2,760.6 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
B · 2,761A · 3,19805,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 15.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
3,198.3 samples/min · community measurement, sample 296 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 296 submissions (15 outliers excluded), interquartile range 3085.66–3284.94; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-09-05; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2,760.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 118 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 118 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2251.76–2939.6; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-08-15; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (26)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 28.9 | 30.2 | A +4.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 15.5 | 16.5 | A +6.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 82.2 | 99.7 | A +21.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 52.8 | 60.6 | A +14.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 55.3 | 67.4 | A +21.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 33.4 | 38.4 | A +14.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 95.6 | 114.7 | A +20% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 99.6 | 122.2 | A +22.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 168.6 | 204.6 | A +21.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 72.9 | 80.8 | A +10.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 264.4 | 324.6 | A +22.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 107.1 | 123.6 | A +15.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,148.8 | 2,914.8 | A +8% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,087.8 | 2,804.4 | A +10.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,988.9 | 2,551.9 | A +17.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,427 | 3,003.3 | A +14.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,406.1 | 2,946.5 | A +15.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,542 | 3,287.6 | A +7.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,590.7 | 3,248.3 | A +10.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,774.5 | 3,486.4 | A +8.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,710.9 | 3,241.2 | A +14.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,257.7 | 2,872.2 | A +13.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,285.4 | 3,005.4 | A +9.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,136 | 2,905.5 | A +7.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,162.6 | 2,692.5 | A +17.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,166.4 | 2,370.4 | A +33.6% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (54)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 34 | 31.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 31.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 28.6 | 31.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 15.3 | 15.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 16 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 15.7 | 17.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 111.8 | 95.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 111.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 82.9 | 102.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 52.6 | 57.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 54.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 53.6 | 65.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 61.5 | 62.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 57.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 53.7 | 61.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 29.9 | 33.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 30.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 29.9 | 36.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 95.3 | 100.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 89.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 94.3 | 105.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 64.1 | 74.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 66.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 63.6 | 82.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 188.2 | 181.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 169.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 167.7 | 190.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 72.4 | 76.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 75.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 73.8 | 86.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 247.8 | 254.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 232.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 200.6 | 231.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 84.1 | 94.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 88.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 84.8 | 104.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,148.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,016.7 | 1,644.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,067.7 | 1,639.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,151.9 | 1,712.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,162.3 | 1,667.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,063.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,342.2 | 2,168.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,153 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,900.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,015.4 | 1,780.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,055.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,793.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,991.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,536.1 | 3,023.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,376.9 | 2,976 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,363.8 | 3,213.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,909.7 | 2,685.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,573.3 | — | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 3070 | B · GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 5,888 (CUDA cores) | 5,120 (CUDA cores) | A: 768 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,500 MHz | no data | no data for B |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,730 MHz | 1,290–1,620 MHz | not directly comparable |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 256 bit | equal |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 220 W (board power) | no data | no data for B |
| Recommended PSU | 650 W | no data | no data for B |
| Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU. | 242 mm | no data | no data for B |
| Thickness (slots) | 2 | no data | no data for B |
| Power connectors (reference) | 1x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE | no data | no data for B |
Chip
Architecture
AAmpere
BAmpere
equalShader units
A5,888 (CUDA cores)
B5,120 (CUDA cores)
A: 768 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,500 MHz
Bno data
no data for BBoost clock
A1,730 MHz
B1,290–1,620 MHz
not directly comparableClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B8 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A256 bit
B256 bit
equal
Power and dimensions
Board power
A220 W (board power)
Bno data
no data for BTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A650 W
Bno data
no data for BLength (reference / Founders Edition)
A242 mm
Bno data
no data for BPartner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
A2
Bno data
no data for BPower connectors (reference)
A1x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPUchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.