GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +16.8%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads in this scenario (up to 16.8% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is better1
Memory bus 128 bit more256 bit vs 128 bit
Where GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is better1
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 12.2% faster3,944 samples/min vs 3,514 samples/min
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 12.2%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti3,514.2 samples/minGeForce RTX 4060 Ti3,944.1 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 3,514B · 3,94405,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is ahead by 12.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
3,514.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 109 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 109 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 3371.91–3561.39; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-11-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
3,944.1 samples/min · community measurement, sample 304 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 304 submissions (28 outliers excluded), interquartile range 3816.63–3962.14; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-03-18; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (9)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,488.7 | 3,771.5 | B +8.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,286.8 | 3,839.7 | B +16.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,395.4 | 3,822.5 | B +12.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 4,130.4 | 4,389.7 | B +6.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 4,100.2 | 4,361.3 | B +6.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,599.4 | 3,839 | B +6.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,624.6 | 3,891.6 | B +7.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,495.5 | 3,792.8 | B +8.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,501.2 | 3,891 | B +11.1% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (52)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 28.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 27.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 25.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 13.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 14 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 14.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 81.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 79.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 110.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 48.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 48.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 49.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 52.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 53.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 53.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 27 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 29.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 29.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 92 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 92.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 88.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 60.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 64.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 63.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 164.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 164.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 148.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 66.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 65.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 68.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 195.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 259.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 214.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 77.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 93.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 93.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,299.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,102.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,039.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,605 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,339.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,849.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,793 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,805.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,795.9 | 3,803.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,888.7 | 4,383.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,891.1 | 4,288.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,076.6 | 3,766.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,325.5 | 3,943.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,665.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,465.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,457.2 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | B · GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 6,144 (CUDA cores) | 4,352 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,580 MHz | 2,310 MHz | B: 730 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,770 MHz | 2,535 MHz | B: 765 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | no data | no data for B |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 | differs |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 128 bit | A: 128 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | no data | 288 GB/s | no data for A |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 290 W (board power) | no data | no data for B |
| Recommended PSU | 750 W | no data | no data for B |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x8 | no data for A |
| Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU. | 267 mm | no data | no data for B |
| Thickness (slots) | 2 | no data | no data for B |
| Power connectors (reference) | 2x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE | no data | no data for B |
Chip
Architecture
AAmpere
BAda Lovelace
differsShader units
A6,144 (CUDA cores)
B4,352 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,580 MHz
B2,310 MHz
B: 730 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,770 MHz
B2,535 MHz
B: 765 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
Bno data
no data for BMemory type
AGDDR6X
BGDDR6
differsMemory bus
A256 bit
B128 bit
A: 128 bit moreMemory bandwidth
Ano data
B288 GB/s
no data for AExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A290 W (board power)
Bno data
no data for BTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A750 W
Bno data
no data for BInterface
Ano data
BPCIe 4.0 x8
no data for ALength (reference / Founders Edition)
A267 mm
Bno data
no data for BPartner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
A2
Bno data
no data for BPower connectors (reference)
A2x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Tichecked November 7, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.