GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: specs and benchmark comparison
Rendering and compute
depends on the taskBenchmark results disagree, so the choice depends on the specific task.
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is better4
Blender Benchmark 2.81 8.4% lower530 s vs 574 s
Video memory 3 GB more11 GB vs 8 GB
Memory bus 96 bit more352 bit vs 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 36.4 GB/s more484.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
Where GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is better11
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 24.4% lower45 s vs 56 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 115.1% lower29 s vs 63 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 10.4% lower156 s vs 172 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 110.5% lower101 s vs 213 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 37.5% lower90 s vs 124 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 49.2% lower148 s vs 220 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 21.1% lower257 s vs 311 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 35.5% lower385 s vs 521 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 172% faster2,235 samples/min vs 821 samples/min
Board power 35 W lower215 W (TDP) vs 250 W (TDP)
Launch price $200 lower$499 vs $699
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- A ahead by 8.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti529.5 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER574.1 sPosition among tested models (4, CUDA)
A · 530B · 57402505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is ahead by 8.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
529.5 s · community measurement, sample 26 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 26 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 513.35–551.47; submissions 2020-01-09 to 2020-01-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
574.1 s · community measurement, sample 27 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 27 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 559.43–586.73; submissions 2020-01-09 to 2020-01-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 24.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti56.2 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER45.2 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 45A · 560100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 24.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
56.2 s · community measurement, sample 76 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 76 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 55.4–57.39; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
45.2 s · community measurement, sample 98 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 98 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 44.61–45.89; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 115.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti62.7 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER29.2 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 29A · 63050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 115.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
62.7 s · community measurement, sample 23 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 23 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 60.35–64.88; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-02-09; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
29.2 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 28.79–29.82; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 10.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti172 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER155.8 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 156A · 1720200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 10.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
172 s · community measurement, sample 58 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 58 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 169.09–175.74; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
155.8 s · community measurement, sample 80 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 80 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 153.23–158.95; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 110.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti212.6 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER101 sPosition among tested models (15, OptiX)
B · 101A · 2130100200300400Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 110.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
212.6 s · community measurement, sample 23 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 23 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 203.94–221.54; submissions 2020-09-06 to 2022-01-26; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
101 s · community measurement, sample 148 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 148 submissions (17 outliers excluded), interquartile range 99.16–102.19; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 37.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti124.3 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER90.4 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 90A · 1240100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 37.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
124.3 s · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 122.73–126.56; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
90.4 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 88.69–91.7; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 49.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti220.4 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER147.7 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 148A · 2200200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 49.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
220.4 s · community measurement, sample 41 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 41 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 218.9–224.53; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
147.7 s · community measurement, sample 69 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 69 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 145.41–149.78; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 21.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti310.6 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER256.6 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 257A · 3110200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 21.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
310.6 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 308.52–315.53; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
256.6 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 254.13–262.18; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 35.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti521.3 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER384.8 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 385A · 52102505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 35.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
521.3 s · community measurement, sample 41 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 41 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 514.79–527.59; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
384.8 s · community measurement, sample 71 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 71 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 379–393.16; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 172%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti821.4 samples/minGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER2,234.5 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 821B · 2,23505,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 172% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
821.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 57 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 57 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 808.6–840.55; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-03-07; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2,234.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2150.53–2296.29; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-11-02; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (49)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 532.3 | 559.4 | A +5.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 62.5 | 49.3 | B +26.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 63.2 | 49.1 | B +28.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 62.2 | 49.9 | B +24.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 64.1 | 50.5 | B +27% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 69.9 | 54.4 | B +28.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 64.3 | 52.2 | B +23.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 61.2 | 25.8 | B +137.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 189.1 | 168.4 | B +12.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 192.2 | 169.4 | B +13.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 192.3 | 165.2 | B +16.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 194.8 | 168 | B +16% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 197.9 | 171.7 | B +15.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 185 | 177.3 | B +4.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 119.6 | 88 | B +35.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 121.3 | 88.1 | B +37.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 123.4 | 90.9 | B +35.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 124.1 | 93.7 | B +32.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 127.4 | 99 | B +28.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 119.1 | 96.4 | B +23.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 245.9 | 153.5 | B +60.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 248.4 | 154 | B +61.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 245.2 | 153.3 | B +59.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 236 | 161.1 | B +46.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 216.7 | 165.1 | B +31.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 213.3 | 157.8 | B +35.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 331 | 287.5 | B +15.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 330.5 | 288.2 | B +14.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 329.7 | 290.1 | B +13.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 337.5 | 290.6 | B +16.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 359 | 305.5 | B +17.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 334.7 | 285.3 | B +17.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 493.3 | 382.7 | B +28.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 491.8 | 383.5 | B +28.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 487.7 | 377.2 | B +29.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 478.1 | 383.5 | B +24.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 472.4 | 376.9 | B +25.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 521.5 | 434.6 | B +20% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 821.5 | 2,189.4 | B +166.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 868 | 2,427.4 | B +179.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 883.9 | 2,447.3 | B +176.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 878.4 | 2,467.7 | B +180.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 879.8 | 2,394.9 | B +172.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 889.7 | 2,619 | B +194.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 889.8 | 2,604.6 | B +192.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 830.7 | 2,374.9 | B +185.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 842.2 | 2,262.8 | B +168.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 829 | 2,228.4 | B +168.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 820.8 | 2,225.8 | B +171.2% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (74)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 65.4 | 51.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 61.8 | 26.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 61.3 | 26.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 193.9 | 172.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 216.5 | 100.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 221.1 | 103 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 221.4 | 104.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 122.4 | 91.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 115.4 | 45.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 115.5 | 45.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 119.4 | 51.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 117.4 | 50.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 214.6 | 154.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 132.1 | 98.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 133.7 | 98.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 172.2 | 172.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 135.1 | 104.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 341.4 | 283.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 330.9 | 128.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 326.6 | 129.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 333.8 | 130.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 334.1 | 135.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 460.2 | 360.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 447.9 | 153.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 436.1 | 152 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 480.3 | 192 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 462.5 | 183.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 936.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 873.8 | 1,556.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 895.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 976.1 | 1,531.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 931.9 | 1,580.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 928.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 960.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 886.4 | 1,569.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 905.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 925.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 969.1 | 1,460.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 685.3 | 2,143.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 699.6 | 2,079.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 935.9 | 2,522.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 780.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 888.7 | 2,413.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 726.9 | 2,072.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 695.2 | 2,123.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 970.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 979.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 26.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 27.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 26.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 25.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 101.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 101.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 100.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 100 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 43.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 43.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 44.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 43.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 82 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 83.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 80.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 79.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 130.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 132.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 131.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 128.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 167.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 166.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 161.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 160.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,546.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,562.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,338.4 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | B · GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | GP102-350-K1-A1 | TU104-410-A1 | differs |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 3,584 (CUDA cores) | 2,560 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,481 MHz | 1,605 MHz | B: 124 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,582 MHz | 1,770 MHz | B: 188 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 11 GB | 8 GB | A: 3 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 | differs |
| Memory bus | 352 bit | 256 bit | A: 96 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 484.4 GB/s | 448 GB/s | A: 36.4 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 250 W (TDP) | 215 W (TDP) | A: 35 W higher |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data | no data for B |
Chip
GPU chip
AGP102-350-K1-A1
BTU104-410-A1
differsArchitecture
APascal
BTuring
differsShader units
A3,584 (CUDA cores)
B2,560 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,481 MHz
B1,605 MHz
B: 124 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,582 MHz
B1,770 MHz
B: 188 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A11 GB
B8 GB
A: 3 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR5X
BGDDR6
differsMemory bus
A352 bit
B256 bit
A: 96 bit moreMemory bandwidth
A484.4 GB/s
B448 GB/s
A: 36.4 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A250 W (TDP)
B215 W (TDP)
A: 35 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 3.0 x16
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti: 11 GB GDDR5X, 352-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
It depends on the task: rendering and compute: results disagree.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.