GeForce GT 710 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB: specs and benchmark comparison
BNVIDIA · Ada Lovelace
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB
- 8 GB GDDR6
- 160 W
- PSU 550 W+
May 24, 2023 · $399 at launch
Short verdict
Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.
Compare with AISome Blender runs list only the shared GPU name. Open the comparison by shared name.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GT 710 is better1
Launch price $364 lower$35 vs $399
Where GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is better1
Memory bus 64 bit more128 bit vs 64 bit
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
Blender Benchmark 2.92
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GT 7102,599.6 sGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GBno dataNo advantage conclusion: no comparable result for the second model.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
2,599.6 s · community measurement, sample 2 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 2 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2577.56–2621.56; submissions 2021-04-06 to 2021-05-28; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB
- no comparable result
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Reference results (20)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 1,846.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 2,063.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 2,013.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 7,324.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 5,348.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 11,595.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 8,309 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 14,140.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 31.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 21.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 22.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 18.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 21.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 18.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 23.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 21.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 23.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 12 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 12.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 9.5 | — | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GT 710 | B · GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | no data | Ada Lovelace | no data for A |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | no data | 4,352 (CUDA cores) | no data for A |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | no data | 2,310 MHz | no data for A |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | no data | 2,540 MHz | no data for A |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | no data | 8 GB | no data for A |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 | differs |
| Memory bus | 64 bit | 128 bit | B: 64 bit more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | no data | 160 W (TGP) | no data for A |
| Recommended PSU | no data | 550 W | no data for A |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0 | differs |
| Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU. | no data | 244 mm | no data for A |
| Thickness (slots) | no data | 2 | no data for A |
| Power connectors (reference) | no data | 1x 16-pin (adapter to 1x 8-pin included) — Founders Edition | no data for A |
Chip
Architecture
Ano data
BAda Lovelace
no data for AShader units
Ano data
B4,352 (CUDA cores)
no data for AShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
Ano data
B2,310 MHz
no data for ABoost clock
Ano data
B2,540 MHz
no data for AClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
Ano data
B8 GB
no data for AMemory type
ADDR3
BGDDR6
differsMemory bus
A64 bit
B128 bit
B: 64 bit more
Power and dimensions
Board power
Ano data
B160 W (TGP)
no data for ATGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
Ano data
B550 W
no data for AInterface
APCIe 2.0
BPCIe 4.0
differsLength (reference / Founders Edition)
Ano data
B244 mm
no data for APartner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
Ano data
B2
no data for APower connectors (reference)
Ano data
B1x 16-pin (adapter to 1x 8-pin included) — Founders Edition
no data for A
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Which PCIe interface do the cards use?
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710: PCIe 2.0. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB: PCIe 4.0.
See also
Data sources (3)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GBchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.