GeForce GT 1030 vs GeForce RTX 5060 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.
Compare with AIAdvantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GT 1030 is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GT 103059.7 samples/minGeForce RTX 5060 Ti4,307.9 samples/minNo advantage conclusion: small sample in one of the results.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
59.7 samples/min · community measurement, sample 10 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 10 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 50.58–71.35; submissions 2025-08-06 to 2025-11-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
4,307.9 samples/min · community measurement, sample 586 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 586 submissions (69 outliers excluded), interquartile range 4214.51–4380.68; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-09-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Reference results (56)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 6,902.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 535.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 540.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 563.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 592.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 544.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 550.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 484 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 604.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 629.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 1,597.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 1,714.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 1,696.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 1,989.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 1,637.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 1,460.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 1,086.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 1,159.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 1,182.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 1,042.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 1,146.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 1,554.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 1,803.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 1,771.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 1,695.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 1,814.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 2,814 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 2,979.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 2,828.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 40.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 56.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 104.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 95.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 102.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 105.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 96.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 95.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 45.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 51.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 55.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 48.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 54.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 56.9 | 4,348 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 71 | 4,148.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 80.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 86.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 77 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 69.6 | 4,781.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 75.5 | 4,345.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 47 | 4,074.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 45.6 | 4,397.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 4,264 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 4,508.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 4,360.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 4,304.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 4,500.5 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GT 1030 | B · GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | no data | GB206-300-A1 | no data for A |
| Architecture | no data | Blackwell | no data for A |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 384 (CUDA cores) | 4,608 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | no data | 2,407 MHz | no data for A |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | no data | 2,572 MHz | no data for A |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 2 GB | no data | no data for B |
| Memory type | no data | GDDR7 | no data for A |
| Memory bus | no data | 128 bit | no data for A |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | no data | 448 GB/s | no data for A |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | no data | 180 W (TDP) | no data for A |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0 x8 | differs |
Chip
GPU chip
Ano data
BGB206-300-A1
no data for AArchitecture
Ano data
BBlackwell
no data for AShader units
A384 (CUDA cores)
B4,608 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
Ano data
B2,407 MHz
no data for ABoost clock
Ano data
B2,572 MHz
no data for AClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A2 GB
Bno data
no data for BMemory type
Ano data
BGDDR7
no data for AMemory bus
Ano data
B128 bit
no data for AMemory bandwidth
Ano data
B448 GB/s
no data for AExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
Ano data
B180 W (TDP)
no data for ATGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 3.0
BPCIe 5.0 x8
differs
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Which PCIe interface do the cards use?
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030: PCIe 3.0. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti: PCIe 5.0 x8.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.