Skip to content
RU

GeForce GT 1030 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB: specs and benchmark comparison

ANVIDIA · GeForce GT

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030

  • 2 GB

May 17, 2017

BNVIDIA · Ada Lovelace

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

  • 16 GB GDDR6
  • 165 W

July 18, 2023 · $499 at launch

Short verdict

Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.

Compare with AI

Some Blender runs list only the shared GPU name. Open the comparison by shared name.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where GeForce GT 1030 is better0

No advantages found in our data.

Where GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is better1

  • Video memory 14 GB more16 GB vs 2 GB

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

  • Blender Benchmark 2.81a

    GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) · s, lower is better

    No advantage conclusion: no comparable result for the second model.

    About the measurement and source
    A · NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030

    6,902.8 s · community measurement, sample 1 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 1 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 6902.75–6902.75; submissions 2020-01-25 to 2020-01-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
    no comparable result

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.

Reference results (51)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA)535.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)540.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)563.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)592.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)544.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)550.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)484—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)604.1—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)629.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA)1,597.6—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA)1,714.2—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA)1,696.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA)1,989.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA)1,637.1—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA)1,460.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)1,086.1—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)1,159.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)1,182.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)1,042.1—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)1,146.6—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)1,554.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA)1,803.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA)1,771.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA)1,695.6—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX)1,814.1—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)2,814—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)2,979.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)2,828.2—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)40.1—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)56.2—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)104.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)95.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)102.2—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)105.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)96.1—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)95.6—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)45.1—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)51.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)55.2—no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)48.6—no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)54.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)59.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)56.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)71—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)80.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)86.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)77—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)69.6—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)75.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)47—no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)45.6—no pair

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Chip

  • GPU chip

    Ano data

    BAD106-351-A1

    no data for A
  • Architecture

    Ano data

    BAda Lovelace

    no data for A
  • Shader units

    A384 (CUDA cores)

    B4,352 (CUDA cores)

    not directly comparable

    Shader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.

Clocks

  • Base clock

    Ano data

    B2,310 MHz

    no data for A
  • Boost clock

    Ano data

    B2,535 MHz

    no data for A

    Clocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.

Memory

  • Video memory

    A2 GB

    B16 GB

    B: 14 GB more
  • Memory type

    Ano data

    BGDDR6

    no data for A
  • Memory bus

    Ano data

    B128 bit

    no data for A
  • Memory bandwidth

    Ano data

    B288 GB/s

    no data for A

    Excludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.

Power and dimensions

  • Board power

    Ano data

    B165 W (TDP)

    no data for A

    TGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.

  • Interface

    APCIe 3.0

    BPCIe 4.0 x8

    differs

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB have?

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030: 2 GB. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB: 16 GB GDDR6, 128-bit bus.

Which PCIe interface do the cards use?

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030: PCIe 3.0. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB: PCIe 4.0 x8.

Data sources (2)
  • Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK