GeForce GT 1030 vs GeForce GTX 1630: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.
Compare with AIAdvantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GT 1030 is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where GeForce GTX 1630 is better1
Video memory 2 GB more4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GT 103075.5 samples/minGeForce GTX 1630247.6 samples/minNo advantage conclusion: small sample in one of the results.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
75.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 14 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 14 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 72.44–77.05; submissions 2025-03-25 to 2026-01-04; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
247.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 1 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 1 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 247.56–247.56; submissions 2025-06-24 to 2025-06-24; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Reference results (52)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 6,902.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 535.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 540.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 563.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 592.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 544.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 550.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 484 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 604.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 629.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 1,597.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 1,714.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 1,696.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 1,989.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 1,637.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 1,460.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 1,086.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 1,159.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 1,182.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 1,042.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 1,146.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 1,554.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 1,803.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 1,771.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 1,695.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 1,814.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 2,814 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 2,979.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 2,828.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 40.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 56.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 104.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 95.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 102.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 105.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 96.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 95.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 45.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 51.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 55.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 48.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 54.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 59.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 56.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 71 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 80.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 86.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 77 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 69.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 47 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 45.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 283 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GT 1030 | B · GeForce GTX 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | no data | TU117-150-KA-A1 | no data for A |
| Architecture | no data | Turing | no data for A |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 384 (CUDA cores) | 512 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | no data | 1,740 MHz | no data for A |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | no data | 1,785 MHz | no data for A |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 2 GB | 4 GB | B: 2 GB more |
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 | no data for A |
| Memory bus | no data | 64 bit | no data for A |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | no data | 96 GB/s | no data for A |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | no data | 75 W (TDP) | no data for A |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 | no data | no data for B |
Chip
GPU chip
Ano data
BTU117-150-KA-A1
no data for AArchitecture
Ano data
BTuring
no data for AShader units
A384 (CUDA cores)
B512 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
Ano data
B1,740 MHz
no data for ABoost clock
Ano data
B1,785 MHz
no data for AClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A2 GB
B4 GB
B: 2 GB moreMemory type
Ano data
BGDDR6
no data for AMemory bus
Ano data
B64 bit
no data for AMemory bandwidth
Ano data
B96 GB/s
no data for AExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
Ano data
B75 W (TDP)
no data for ATGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 3.0
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 have?
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030: 2 GB. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630: 4 GB GDDR6, 64-bit bus.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.