Skip to content
RU

GeForce 930MX vs GeForce GTX 980M: specs and benchmark comparison

ANVIDIA · Maxwell

NVIDIA GeForce 930MX

  • 2 GB

BNVIDIA · Maxwell

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

  • 100 W

October 7, 2014

Short verdict

Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.

Compare with AI

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where GeForce 930MX is better0

No advantages found in our data.

Where GeForce GTX 980M is better0

No advantages found in our data.

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.

  • Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

    GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better

    No advantage conclusion: small sample in one of the results.

    About the measurement and source
    A · NVIDIA GeForce 930MX

    721.2 s · community measurement, sample 1 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 1 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 721.23–721.23; submissions 2021-12-09 to 2021-12-09; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

    140.4 s · community measurement, sample 3 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 3 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 140.26–140.78; submissions 2021-09-09 to 2021-10-19; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.

Reference results (48)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA)928.7185.7reference
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)837.8188.9reference
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)1,002.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA)3,035.2683.7reference
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)55.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)84.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)—168.8no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)—186.5no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)—208.7no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA)—654.1no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA)—593.4no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA)—663.6no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA)—540.4no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX)—799.8no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)—391.2no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)—371.6no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)—412.6no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)—409.9no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)—984.1no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)—512.3no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA)—990no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA)—726no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA)—907no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA)—765.2no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA)—2,050.1no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX)—602.7no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)—1,107no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)—1,332.7no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)—1,074.5no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)—1,105.8no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)—2,069.1no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)—1,268.9no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA)—3,033.8no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA)—5,682.2no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA)—2,977no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA)—1,576.4no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA)—4,416.3no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX)—1,903.2no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—286.3no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—275no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—240.3no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—238no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—290.2no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—279no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—259.2no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—252.3no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—273.7no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—184.5no pair

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.

Chip

  • GPU chip

    Ano data

    BGM204

    no data for A
  • Architecture

    AMaxwell

    BMaxwell

    equal
  • Shader units

    A384 (CUDA cores)

    Bno data

    no data for B

    Shader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.

Memory

  • Video memory

    A2 GB

    Bno data

    no data for B
  • Memory type

    Ano data

    BGDDR5

    no data for A
  • Memory bus

    Ano data

    B256 bit

    no data for A
  • Memory bandwidth

    Ano data

    B160 GB/s

    no data for A

    Excludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.

Power and dimensions

  • Board power

    Ano data

    B100 W (TDP)

    no data for A

    TGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.

  • Interface

    Ano data

    BPCIe 3.0 x16

    no data for A

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict
Data sources (2)
  • Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK