Skip to content
RU

GeForce 930M vs GeForce GT 750M: specs and benchmark comparison

ANVIDIA · Maxwell

NVIDIA GeForce 930M

  • 2 GB DDR3
  • 29 W

March 12, 2015

BNVIDIA · Kepler

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

  • 2 GB
  • 50 W

April 1, 2013

Short verdict

Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.

Compare with AI

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where GeForce 930M is better1

  • Board power 21 W lower29 W (TDP) vs 50 W (TDP)

Where GeForce GT 750M is better1

  • Memory bus 64 bit more128 bit vs 64 bit

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.

  • Blender Benchmark 2.90

    GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better

    No advantage conclusion: small sample in one of the results.

    About the measurement and source
    A · NVIDIA GeForce 930M

    988 s · community measurement, sample 1 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 1 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 987.99–987.99; submissions 2021-01-05 to 2021-01-05; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    B · NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

    1,011.5 s · community measurement, sample 1 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 1 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1011.47–1011.47; submissions 2021-01-01 to 2021-01-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.

Reference results (16)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)927—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)913.2968.1reference
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)66.855.1reference
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)45.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)55.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)—1,002.2no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA)—8,728.6no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA)—4,568.2no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—57.6no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—50.3no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—44.5no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—60.7no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—61.5no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—58.1no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—40.1no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—40no pair

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.

Chip

  • GPU chip

    AGM108

    BGK107

    differs
  • Architecture

    AMaxwell

    BKepler

    differs

Clocks

  • Base clock

    Ano data

    B967 MHz

    no data for A

Memory

  • Video memory

    A2 GB

    B2 GB

    equal
  • Memory type

    ADDR3

    Bno data

    no data for B
  • Memory bus

    A64 bit

    B128 bit

    B: 64 bit more
  • Memory bandwidth

    A14.4 GB/s

    Bno data

    no data for B

    Excludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.

Power and dimensions

  • Board power

    A29 W (TDP)

    B50 W (TDP)

    B: 21 W higher

    TGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.

  • Interface

    APCIe 3.0 x16

    BPCIe 3.0 x16

    equal

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce 930M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M have?

NVIDIA GeForce 930M: 2 GB DDR3, 64-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M: 2 GB, 128-bit bus.

Which PCIe interface do the cards use?

NVIDIA GeForce 930M: PCIe 3.0 x16. NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M: PCIe 3.0 x16.

Data sources (2)
  • Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce 930M, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1checked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK