Skip to content
RU

GeForce 930A vs GeForce RTX 3080: specs and benchmark comparison

ANVIDIA · GeForce

NVIDIA GeForce 930A

    BNVIDIA · Ampere

    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

    • 10 GB GDDR6X
    • 320 W
    • PSU 750 W+

    September 17, 2020

    Short verdict

    Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.

    Compare with AI

    Advantages

    Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

    Where GeForce 930A is better0

    No advantages found in our data.

    Where GeForce RTX 3080 is better0

    No advantages found in our data.

    Benchmarks

    Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

    • Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

      GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better

      No advantage conclusion: no comparable result for the first model.

      About the measurement and source
      A · NVIDIA GeForce 930A
      no comparable result
      B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

      19.9 s · community measurement, sample 293 · November 14, 2026

      Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

      Median of 293 submissions (37 outliers excluded), interquartile range 19.64–20.28; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

      difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

      Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.

    Reference results (80)
    BenchmarkABDifference
    Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)870.4—no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)—25.5no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)—25.4no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)—21.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)—21.8no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)—10.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)—11no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)—10.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)—11.4no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA)—78.1no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA)—96.6no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA)—68.6no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA)—65.3no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA)—93.8no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX)—41.4no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX)—42.5no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX)—39.5no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX)—39.9no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)—45.8no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)—46.4no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)—39.5no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)—40.8no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)—40.2no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)—19.8no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)—19.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)—21.4no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)—21.6no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA)—68.4no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (CUDA)—68.4no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA)—68.4no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA)—68.9no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA)—64.6no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX)—42.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX)—42.1no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX)—45.8no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX)—45.3no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)—145.3no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)—139.1no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)—129.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)—130no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)—119no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)—53.6no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)—54.5no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)—53no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)—54.2no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA)—191.6no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA)—195no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA)—150.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA)—207.5no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA)—165.8no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX)—60.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX)—62.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX)—70.9no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX)—71.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—2,981.3no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—2,845.2no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—2,902.8no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—3,291.3no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—3,193.9no pair
    Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—2,989.8no pair
    Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,450.1no pair
    Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,526.6no pair
    Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,379.9no pair
    Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,197.4no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—5,065.1no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,893.1no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—5,100.4no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,851.8no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,870.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—5,025.1no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—5,001.5no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—5,251.5no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—5,201.5no pair
    Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,564.4no pair
    Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,614.7no pair
    Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,511.6no pair
    Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,478.6no pair
    Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,105.5no pair
    Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,330.8no pair
    Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—4,546.6no pair

    Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

    Specifications

    Chip

    • Architecture

      Ano data

      BAmpere

      no data for A
    • Shader units

      Ano data

      B8,704 (CUDA cores)

      no data for A

      Shader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.

    Clocks

    • Base clock

      Ano data

      B1,440 MHz

      no data for A
    • Boost clock

      Ano data

      B1,710 MHz

      no data for A

      Clocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.

    Memory

    • Video memory

      Ano data

      B10 GB

      no data for A
    • Memory type

      Ano data

      BGDDR6X

      no data for A
    • Memory bus

      Ano data

      B320 bit

      no data for A

    Power and dimensions

    • Board power

      Ano data

      B320 W (board power)

      no data for A

      TGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.

    • Recommended PSU

      Ano data

      B750 W

      no data for A
    • Interface

      Ano data

      BPCIe 4.0

      no data for A
    • Length (reference / Founders Edition)

      Ano data

      B285 mm

      no data for A

      Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.

    • Thickness (slots)

      Ano data

      B2

      no data for A
    • Power connectors (reference)

      Ano data

      B2x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — Founders Edition

      no data for A

    “More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

    Compare with AI

    An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

    AI verdict
    Data sources (4)
    • NVIDIA (device identification) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce 930Achecked November 14, 2026
    • NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080checked November 7, 2026
    • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
    • Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026

    How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

    TelegramVK