Skip to content
RU

GeForce 930A vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM: specs and benchmark comparison

ANVIDIA · GeForce

NVIDIA GeForce 930A

    BNVIDIA · Kepler

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

    • 2 GB GDDR5
    • 170 W

    September 27, 2013

    Short verdict

    Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.

    Compare with AI

    Advantages

    Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

    Where GeForce 930A is better0

    No advantages found in our data.

    Where GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is better0

    No advantages found in our data.

    Benchmarks

    Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

    • Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

      GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better

      No advantage conclusion: no comparable result for the first model.

      About the measurement and source
      A · NVIDIA GeForce 930A
      no comparable result
      B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

      245.6 s · community measurement, sample 3 · November 14, 2026

      Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

      Median of 3 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 245.59–246.5; submissions 2021-07-23 to 2021-08-05; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

      difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

      Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.

    Reference results (4)
    BenchmarkABDifference
    Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)870.4—no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA)—900.3no pair
    Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)—518no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—179.9no pair

    Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

    Specifications

    Chip

    • GPU chip

      Ano data

      BGK104-325-A2

      no data for A
    • Architecture

      Ano data

      BKepler

      no data for A
    • Shader units

      Ano data

      B1,344 (CUDA cores)

      no data for A

      Shader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.

    Clocks

    • Base clock

      Ano data

      B915 MHz

      no data for A
    • Boost clock

      Ano data

      B980 MHz

      no data for A

      Clocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.

    Memory

    • Video memory

      Ano data

      B2 GB

      no data for A
    • Memory type

      Ano data

      BGDDR5

      no data for A
    • Memory bus

      Ano data

      B256 bit

      no data for A
    • Memory bandwidth

      Ano data

      B192.3 GB/s

      no data for A

      Excludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.

    Power and dimensions

    • Board power

      Ano data

      B170 W (TDP)

      no data for A

      TGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.

    • Interface

      Ano data

      BPCIe 3.0 x16

      no data for A

    “More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

    Compare with AI

    An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

    AI verdict
    Data sources (3)

    How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

    TelegramVK