GeForce 920M vs GeForce MX110: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.
Compare with AIAdvantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce 920M is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where GeForce MX110 is better1
Board power 3 W lower30 W (TDP) vs 33 W (TDP)
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce 920M3,609.6 sGeForce MX1104,035.5 sNo advantage conclusion: small sample in one of the results.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce 920M
3,609.6 s · community measurement, sample 1 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 1 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 3609.58–3609.58; submissions 2020-09-04 to 2020-09-04; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce MX110
4,035.5 s · community measurement, sample 1 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 1 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 4035.5–4035.5; submissions 2020-12-19 to 2020-12-19; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Reference results (16)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 1,061.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 1,105 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 1,045 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 1,090.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 1,444.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 3,615.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 2,154.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 49.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 47.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 45.2 | 42.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 36.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 1,083.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 3,700.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 38.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 36.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 41.2 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.
| Specification | A · GeForce 920M | B · GeForce MX110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | GK208 | GM108 | differs |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | no data | 256 (CUDA cores) | no data for A |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | no data | 965 MHz | no data for A |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | no data | 993 MHz | no data for A |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 2 GB | 2 GB | equal |
| Memory type | DDR3 | no data | no data for B |
| Memory bus | 64 bit | 64 bit | equal |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 14.4 GB/s | no data | no data for B |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 33 W (TDP) | 30 W (TDP) | A: 3 W higher |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x4 | differs |
Chip
GPU chip
AGK208
BGM108
differsArchitecture
AKepler
BMaxwell
differsShader units
Ano data
B256 (CUDA cores)
no data for AShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
Ano data
B965 MHz
no data for ABoost clock
Ano data
B993 MHz
no data for AClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A2 GB
B2 GB
equalMemory type
ADDR3
Bno data
no data for BMemory bus
A64 bit
B64 bit
equalMemory bandwidth
A14.4 GB/s
Bno data
no data for BExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A33 W (TDP)
B30 W (TDP)
A: 3 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 3.0 x16
BPCIe 3.0 x4
differs
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce MX110 have?
NVIDIA GeForce 920M: 2 GB DDR3, 64-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce MX110: 2 GB, 64-bit bus.
Which PCIe interface do the cards use?
NVIDIA GeForce 920M: PCIe 3.0 x16. NVIDIA GeForce MX110: PCIe 3.0 x4.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce 920M, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce MX110, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.