Skip to content
RU

GeForce 840M vs GeForce GT 740M: specs and benchmark comparison

ANVIDIA · Maxwell

NVIDIA GeForce 840M

  • 30 W

March 12, 2014

BNVIDIA · Kepler

NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

  • 2 GB

April 1, 2013

Short verdict

Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.

Compare with AI

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where GeForce 840M is better0

No advantages found in our data.

Where GeForce GT 740M is better0

No advantages found in our data.

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.

  • Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

    GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better

    No advantage conclusion: small sample in one of the results.

    About the measurement and source
    A · NVIDIA GeForce 840M

    716.1 s · community measurement, sample 1 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 1 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 716.1–716.1; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2021-07-17; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    B · NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

    1,338.8 s · community measurement, sample 1 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 1 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1338.76–1338.76; submissions 2021-09-05 to 2021-09-05; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.

Reference results (22)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)868.61,027.4reference
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)889.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)893.71,066.4reference
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)860.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)991.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA)2,871.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA)2,953—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA)2,554.6—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)1,790.43,082.3reference
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)1,979.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA)3,088.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)4,657.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA)98,992—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)24.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)66.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)45.1—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)47.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)42.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)—2,379.5no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—34no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—41no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)—26.1no pair

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.

Chip

  • GPU chip

    AGM108

    Bno data

    no data for B
  • Architecture

    AMaxwell

    BKepler

    differs

Clocks

  • Base clock

    A1,029 MHz

    Bno data

    no data for B

Memory

  • Video memory

    Ano data

    B2 GB

    no data for A
  • Memory type

    ADDR3

    Bno data

    no data for B
  • Memory bus

    A64 bit

    Bno data

    no data for B
  • Memory bandwidth

    A16 GB/s

    Bno data

    no data for B

    Excludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.

Power and dimensions

  • Board power

    A30 W (TDP)

    Bno data

    no data for B

    TGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.

  • Interface

    APCIe 3.0 x16

    BPCIe 3.0

    differs

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

Which PCIe interface do the cards use?

NVIDIA GeForce 840M: PCIe 3.0 x16. NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M: PCIe 3.0.

Data sources (2)
  • Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce 840M, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0checked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK