Skip to content
RU

Core i9-14900K vs Core Ultra 9 285K: specs and benchmark comparison

AIntel · Raptor Lake Refresh

Intel Core i9-14900K

  • 24 cores / 32 threads
  • up to 6 GHz
  • LGA1700

October 17, 2023 · $589 at launch

BIntel · Arrow Lake

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

  • 24 cores / 24 threads
  • up to 5.7 GHz
  • LGA1851

October 24, 2024 · $589 at launch

Short verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Compare with AI
← Core i9-14900KCore Ultra 9 285K →
  • Multi-thread performance

    B +16%

    Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads in this scenario (up to 16% in comparable benchmarks).

No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where Core i9-14900K is better1

  • Threads 8 more32 vs 24

Where Core Ultra 9 285K is better4

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 9.8% faster561 samples/min vs 511 samples/min

  • L2 cache 8 MB more40 MB vs 32 MB

  • Official memory speed 800 MT/s more6,400 MT/s vs 5,600 MT/s

  • Max memory capacity 64 GB more256 GB vs 192 GB

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

    CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

    B ahead by 9.8%

    Position among tested models (89)

    A · 511B · 561
    0200400600800
    Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

    Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is ahead by 9.8% in this benchmark.

    About the measurement and source
    A · Intel Core i9-14900K

    511.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 233 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 233 submissions (42 outliers excluded), interquartile range 490.19–535.27; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-07-02; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    B · Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

    561.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 236 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 236 submissions (44 outliers excluded), interquartile range 545.02–579.08; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-10-22; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Other comparable benchmarks (6)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom480.9558.1B +16%
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom543.4612B +12.6%
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom527.1574.7B +9%
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom499.5543.8B +8.9%
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom516.4557.2B +7.9%
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom548.5607.8B +10.8%

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Reference results (8)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom520.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom500.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom552.2—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom507.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom529.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom521.1393.6reference
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom499—no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom476.5525.3reference

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Cores and clocks

  • Cores

    A24 (8P + 16E)

    B24 (8P + 16E)

    equal

    Cores of different types may differ in performance.

  • Threads

    A32

    B24

    A: 8 more
  • Base clock

    A3.2 GHz

    B3.7 GHz

    B: 0.5 GHz more

    For hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.

  • Max clock (Boost/Turbo)

    A6 GHz

    B5.7 GHz

    A: 0.3 GHz more

Cache

  • L2 cache

    A32 MB

    B40 MB

    B: 8 MB more
  • L3 cache

    A36 MB

    B36 MB

    equal

Platform

  • Socket

    ALGA1700

    BLGA1851

    differs
  • Process node

    AIntel 7

    BTSMC N3B

    differs

Memory and interfaces

  • Memory type

    ADDR4, DDR5

    BDDR5

    differs
  • Memory channels

    A2

    B2

    equal
  • Official memory speed

    A5,600 MT/s

    B6,400 MT/s

    B: 800 MT/s more

    For controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.

  • Max memory capacity

    A192 GB

    B256 GB

    B: 64 GB more
  • PCI Express

    APCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes

    BPCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 24 lanes

    differs
  • Integrated graphics

    AIntel UHD Graphics 770

    BIntel Graphics (4 Xe cores)

    differs

Power

  • Processor Base Power (Intel)

    A125 W

    B125 W

    equal
  • Maximum Turbo Power (Intel)

    A253 W

    B250 W

    A: 3 W higher

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Platform compatibility

  • Socket Incompatible

    Intel Core i9-14900K uses LGA1700, Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses LGA1851. The CPUs are not interchangeable: switching requires a different motherboard.

  • Memory Needs checking

    Both controllers support DDR5. The motherboard determines the memory type, so check its specification.

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

Do Intel Core i9-14900K and Intel Core Ultra 9 285K fit the same motherboard?

No: Intel Core i9-14900K uses LGA1700, while Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses LGA1851.

How many cores and threads do Intel Core i9-14900K and Intel Core Ultra 9 285K have?

Intel Core i9-14900K: 24 cores / 32 threads. Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 24 cores / 24 threads (manufacturer data).

Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

Intel Core i9-14900K: Intel UHD Graphics 770. Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: Intel Graphics (4 Xe cores).

Which is faster: Intel Core i9-14900K or Intel Core Ultra 9 285K?

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Data sources (3)
  • Intel — specifications of Intel Core i9-14900K, specifications of Intel Core Ultra 9 285Kchecked November 7, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
  • Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK