Skip to content
RU

Core i9-13900H vs Ryzen 5 7500F: specs and benchmark comparison

AIntel · Raptor Lake

Intel Core i9-13900H

  • 14 cores / 20 threads
  • up to 5.4 GHz
  • FCBGA1744

2023

BAMD · Zen 4

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

  • 6 cores / 12 threads
  • up to 5 GHz
  • AM5

July 22, 2023 · $179 at launch

Short verdict

It depends on the task: multi-thread performance: results disagree.

Compare with AI
← Core i9-13900HRyzen 5 7500F →

  • Multi-thread performance

    depends on the task

    Benchmark results disagree, so the choice depends on the specific task.

No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where Core i9-13900H is better2

  • Cores 8 more14 (6P + 8E) vs 6

  • Threads 8 more20 vs 12

Where Ryzen 5 7500F is better3

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 5% faster194 samples/min vs 185 samples/min

  • L3 cache 8 MB more32 MB vs 24 MB

  • Max memory capacity 32 GB more128 GB vs 96 GB

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

    CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

    B ahead by 5%

    Position among tested models (89)

    A · 185B · 194
    0200400600800
    Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

    AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is ahead by 5% in this benchmark.

    About the measurement and source
    A · Intel Core i9-13900H

    185.3 samples/min · community measurement, sample 65 · November 15, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 65 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 157.59–215.16; submissions 2025-07-19 to 2026-03-04; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.

    B · AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

    194.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 84 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 84 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 185.37–200.76; submissions 2025-07-21 to 2026-08-25; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Other comparable benchmarks (7)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom153.7191.8B +24.8%
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom207.9211.5B +1.7%
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom190.1208.2B +9.5%
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom215.4199.3A +8.1%
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom203.2209.1B +2.9%
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom207.1189A +9.6%
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom196.8192.7A +2.1%

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Reference results (6)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom217.6219.3reference
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom210.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom262—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom230.2—no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom196.8189.4reference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom163.6202.9reference

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.

Cores and clocks

  • Cores

    A14 (6P + 8E)

    B6

    A: 8 more

    Cores of different types may differ in performance.

  • Threads

    A20

    B12

    A: 8 more

  • Base clock

    Ano data

    B3.7 GHz

    no data for A

    For hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.

  • Max clock (Boost/Turbo)

    A5.4 GHz

    B5 GHz

    A: 0.4 GHz more

  • Unlocked multiplier

    Ano data

    Byes

    no data for A

Cache

  • L1 cache

    Ano data

    B384 KB

    no data for A

  • L2 cache

    Ano data

    B6 MB

    no data for A

  • L3 cache

    A24 MB

    B32 MB

    B: 8 MB more

Platform

  • Socket

    AFCBGA1744

    BAM5

    differs

  • Process node

    AIntel 7

    BTSMC 5 nm FinFET

    differs

Memory and interfaces

  • Memory type

    ADDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4x, LPDDR5/x

    BDDR5

    differs

  • Memory channels

    A2

    B2

    equal

  • Official memory speed

    A5,200 MT/s

    B5,200 MT/s

    equal

    For controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.

  • Max memory capacity

    A96 GB

    B128 GB

    B: 32 GB more

  • PCI Express

    APCIe 5.0, 28 lanes

    BPCIe 5.0, 24 lanes

    differs

  • Integrated graphics

    AIntel Iris Xe Graphics (eligible)

    Bnone

    differs

Power

  • TDP (AMD method)

    Ano data

    B65 W

    no data for A

    AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.

  • Processor Base Power (Intel)

    A45 W

    Bno data

    no data for B

  • Maximum Turbo Power (Intel)

    A115 W

    Bno data

    no data for B

  • Minimum Assured Power (Intel)

    A35 W

    Bno data

    no data for B

    The lower bound to which the laptop maker can reduce the CPU’s base power.

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

Do Intel Core i9-13900H and AMD Ryzen 5 7500F fit the same motherboard?

No: Intel Core i9-13900H uses FCBGA1744, while AMD Ryzen 5 7500F uses AM5.

How many cores and threads do Intel Core i9-13900H and AMD Ryzen 5 7500F have?

Intel Core i9-13900H: 14 cores / 20 threads. AMD Ryzen 5 7500F: 6 cores / 12 threads (manufacturer data).

Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

Intel Core i9-13900H: Intel Iris Xe Graphics (eligible). AMD Ryzen 5 7500F: no.

Which is faster: Intel Core i9-13900H or AMD Ryzen 5 7500F?

It depends on the task: multi-thread performance: results disagree.

Data sources (4)
  • Intel — specifications of Intel Core i9-13900Hchecked November 7, 2026
  • AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 5 7500Fchecked November 7, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0checked November 14, 2026
  • Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK