Skip to content
RU

Core i7-13650HX vs Core Ultra 9 285H: specs and benchmark comparison

AIntel · Raptor Lake

Intel Core i7-13650HX

  • 14 cores / 20 threads
  • up to 4.9 GHz
  • FCBGA1964

2023

BIntel · Arrow Lake

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

  • 16 cores / 16 threads
  • up to 5.4 GHz
  • FCBGA2049

2025

Short verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Compare with AI
← Core i7-13650HXCore Ultra 9 285H →
  • Multi-thread performance

    B +5.5%

    Intel Core Ultra 9 285H leads in this scenario (up to 5.5% in comparable benchmarks).

No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where Core i7-13650HX is better2

  • Threads 4 more20 vs 16

  • Max memory capacity 64 GB more192 GB vs 128 GB

Where Core Ultra 9 285H is better4

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 5.5% faster226 samples/min vs 214 samples/min

  • Cores 2 more16 (6P + 10E) vs 14 (6P + 8E)

  • Official memory speed 1,600 MT/s more6,400 MT/s vs 4,800 MT/s

  • Processor Base Power (Intel) 10 W lower45 W vs 55 W

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

    CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

    B ahead by 5.5%

    Position among tested models (89)

    A · 214B · 226
    0200400600800
    Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

    Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is ahead by 5.5% in this benchmark.

    About the measurement and source
    A · Intel Core i7-13650HX

    214 samples/min · community measurement, sample 89 · November 15, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 89 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 172.93–263.41; submissions 2025-07-23 to 2026-06-15; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.

    B · Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

    225.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 54 · November 15, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 54 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 185.31–258.91; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-03-04; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Reference results (14)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom231.4222.6reference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom236.7270.1reference
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom210.4250.8reference
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom228.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom285.1—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom284.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom259.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom246.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom259.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom219.7224.8reference
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom248.1256.9reference
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom207.5240.1reference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom253.3232reference
Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—142.3no pair

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.

Cores and clocks

  • Cores

    A14 (6P + 8E)

    B16 (6P + 10E)

    B: 2 more

    Cores of different types may differ in performance.

  • Threads

    A20

    B16

    A: 4 more
  • Base clock

    Ano data

    B2.9 GHz

    no data for A

    For hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.

  • Max clock (Boost/Turbo)

    A4.9 GHz

    B5.4 GHz

    B: 0.5 GHz more

Cache

  • L3 cache

    A24 MB

    B24 MB

    equal

Platform

  • Socket

    AFCBGA1964

    BFCBGA2049

    differs
  • Process node

    AIntel 7

    Bno data

    no data for B

Memory and interfaces

  • Memory type

    ADDR4, DDR5

    BDDR5, LPDDR5/x

    differs
  • Memory channels

    A2

    B2

    equal
  • Official memory speed

    A4,800 MT/s

    B6,400 MT/s

    B: 1,600 MT/s more

    For controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.

  • Max memory capacity

    A192 GB

    B128 GB

    A: 64 GB more
  • PCI Express

    APCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes

    BPCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 28 lanes

    differs
  • Integrated graphics

    AIntel UHD Graphics (13th gen)

    BIntel Arc 140T GPU

    differs

Power

  • Processor Base Power (Intel)

    A55 W

    B45 W

    A: 10 W higher
  • Maximum Turbo Power (Intel)

    A157 W

    B115 W

    A: 42 W higher
  • Minimum Assured Power (Intel)

    A45 W

    B35 W

    A: 10 W higher

    The lower bound to which the laptop maker can reduce the CPU’s base power.

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

Do Intel Core i7-13650HX and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H fit the same motherboard?

No: Intel Core i7-13650HX uses FCBGA1964, while Intel Core Ultra 9 285H uses FCBGA2049.

How many cores and threads do Intel Core i7-13650HX and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H have?

Intel Core i7-13650HX: 14 cores / 20 threads. Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: 16 cores / 16 threads (manufacturer data).

Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

Intel Core i7-13650HX: Intel UHD Graphics (13th gen). Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Intel Arc 140T GPU.

Which is faster: Intel Core i7-13650HX or Intel Core Ultra 9 285H?

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Data sources (2)
  • Intel — specifications of Intel Core i7-13650HX, specifications of Intel Core Ultra 9 285Hchecked November 7, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK