Core i7-12700K vs Ryzen 9 5900X: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIMulti-thread performance
B +9%AMD Ryzen 9 5900X leads in this scenario (up to 9% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Core i7-12700K is better3
L2 cache 6 MB more12 MB vs 6 MB
Official memory speed 1,600 MT/s more4,800 MT/s vs 3,200 MT/s
Launch price $140 lower$409 vs $549
Where Ryzen 9 5900X is better3
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 6.3% faster306 samples/min vs 288 samples/min
Threads 4 more24 vs 20
L3 cache 39 MB more64 MB vs 25 MB
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 6.3%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better
Core i7-12700K288.1 samples/minRyzen 9 5900X306.2 samples/minPosition among tested models (89)
A · 288B · 3060200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is ahead by 6.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · Intel Core i7-12700K
288.1 samples/min · community measurement, sample 108 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 108 submissions (12 outliers excluded), interquartile range 275.14–299.26; submissions 2025-07-27 to 2026-10-20; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
306.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 288 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 288 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 291.15–327.4; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-06-23; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (13)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 276.7 | 289 | B +4.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 319 | 347.6 | B +9% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 309.5 | 321.1 | B +3.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 315.4 | 319.8 | B +1.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 311.1 | 318.8 | B +2.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 329.6 | 332.6 | B +0.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 309.2 | 319.9 | B +3.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 306.9 | 311.4 | B +1.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 294.8 | 310.6 | B +5.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 286 | 301.6 | B +5.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 275.7 | 294.8 | B +6.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 276.2 | 284.3 | B +2.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 278.6 | 293.5 | B +5.4% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (18)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, bmw27 (CPU) | 102.2 | 96.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 313 | 324.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 303.4 | 316.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 286 | 279.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 316.6 | 332.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81CPU, bmw27 (CPU) | — | 108.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, bmw27 (CPU) | — | 117.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81CPU, classroom (CPU) | — | 326.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, classroom (CPU) | — | 276.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, classroom (CPU) | — | 298.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, fishy_cat (CPU) | — | 136.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, fishy_cat (CPU) | — | 148.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, koro (CPU) | — | 194.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, koro (CPU) | — | 229.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, pavillon_barcelona (CPU) | — | 298.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, pavillon_barcelona (CPU) | — | 309.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, victor (CPU) | — | 529.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, victor (CPU) | — | 496.1 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · Core i7-12700K | B · Ryzen 9 5900X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores and clocks | |||
| CoresCores of different types may differ in performance. | 12 (8P + 4E) | 12 | equal |
| Threads | 20 | 24 | B: 4 more |
| Base clockFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown. | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz | B: 0.1 GHz more |
| Max clock (Boost/Turbo) | 5 GHz | 4.8 GHz | A: 0.2 GHz more |
| Unlocked multiplier | no data | yes | no data for A |
| Cache | |||
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB | A: 6 MB more |
| L3 cache | 25 MB | 64 MB | B: 39 MB more |
| Platform | |||
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 | differs |
| Process node | Intel 7 | TSMC 7 nm FinFET | differs |
| Memory and interfaces | |||
| Memory type | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 | differs |
| Memory channels | 2 | no data | no data for B |
| Official memory speedFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown. | 4,800 MT/s | 3,200 MT/s | A: 1,600 MT/s more |
| Max memory capacity | 128 GB | no data | no data for B |
| PCI Express | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes | PCIe 4.0 | differs |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | none | differs |
| Power | |||
| TDP (AMD method)AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP. | no data | 105 W | no data for A |
| Processor Base Power (Intel) | 125 W | no data | no data for B |
| Maximum Turbo Power (Intel) | 190 W | no data | no data for B |
Cores and clocks
Cores
A12 (8P + 4E)
B12
equalCores of different types may differ in performance.
Threads
A20
B24
B: 4 moreBase clock
A3.6 GHz
B3.7 GHz
B: 0.1 GHz moreFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.
Max clock (Boost/Turbo)
A5 GHz
B4.8 GHz
A: 0.2 GHz moreUnlocked multiplier
Ano data
Byes
no data for A
Cache
L2 cache
A12 MB
B6 MB
A: 6 MB moreL3 cache
A25 MB
B64 MB
B: 39 MB more
Platform
Socket
ALGA1700
BAM4
differsProcess node
AIntel 7
BTSMC 7 nm FinFET
differs
Memory and interfaces
Memory type
ADDR4, DDR5
BDDR4
differsMemory channels
A2
Bno data
no data for BOfficial memory speed
A4,800 MT/s
B3,200 MT/s
A: 1,600 MT/s moreFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.
Max memory capacity
A128 GB
Bno data
no data for BPCI Express
APCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes
BPCIe 4.0
differsIntegrated graphics
AIntel UHD Graphics 770
Bnone
differs
Power
TDP (AMD method)
Ano data
B105 W
no data for AAMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.
Processor Base Power (Intel)
A125 W
Bno data
no data for BMaximum Turbo Power (Intel)
A190 W
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Platform compatibility
Socket Incompatible
Intel Core i7-12700K uses LGA1700, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4. The CPUs are not interchangeable: switching requires a different motherboard.
Memory Needs checking
Both controllers support DDR4. The motherboard determines the memory type, so check its specification.
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Do Intel Core i7-12700K and AMD Ryzen 9 5900X fit the same motherboard?
No: Intel Core i7-12700K uses LGA1700, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4.
How many cores and threads do Intel Core i7-12700K and AMD Ryzen 9 5900X have?
Intel Core i7-12700K: 12 cores / 20 threads. AMD Ryzen 9 5900X: 12 cores / 24 threads (manufacturer data).
Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?
Intel Core i7-12700K: Intel UHD Graphics 770. AMD Ryzen 9 5900X: no.
Which is faster: Intel Core i7-12700K or AMD Ryzen 9 5900X?
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (4)
- Intel — specifications of Intel Core i7-12700Kchecked November 7, 2026
- AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 9 5900Xchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.