Core i5-14600KF vs Core Ultra 5 245K: specs and benchmark comparison
BIntel · Arrow Lake
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
- 14 cores / 14 threads
- up to 5.2 GHz
- LGA1851
October 24, 2024 · $309 at launch
Short verdict
Intel Core i5-14600KF leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIMulti-thread performance
A +23.4%Intel Core i5-14600KF leads in this scenario (up to 23.4% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Core i5-14600KF is better1
Threads 6 more20 vs 14
Where Core Ultra 5 245K is better3
L2 cache 6 MB more26 MB vs 20 MB
Official memory speed 800 MT/s more6,400 MT/s vs 5,600 MT/s
Max memory capacity 64 GB more256 GB vs 192 GB
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- 3.9% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better
Core i5-14600KF309.4 samples/minCore Ultra 5 245K321.4 samples/minPosition among tested models (89)
A · 309B · 3210200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. The 3.9% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · Intel Core i5-14600KF
309.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 67 · November 15, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 67 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 295.65–319.53; submissions 2025-07-21 to 2026-03-11; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.
- B · Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
321.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 22 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 22 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 310.8–336.58; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-03-20; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (1)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 335 | 271.6 | A +23.4% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (11)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 301.9 | 322.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 338.8 | 356 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 348.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 320.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 313.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 321.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 297.6 | 311.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 318.9 | 315.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 306.7 | 316.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 334.1 | 362.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 340.5 | — | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · Core i5-14600KF | B · Core Ultra 5 245K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores and clocks | |||
| CoresCores of different types may differ in performance. | 14 (6P + 8E) | 14 (6P + 8E) | equal |
| Threads | 20 | 14 | A: 6 more |
| Base clockFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown. | 3.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz | B: 0.7 GHz more |
| Max clock (Boost/Turbo) | 5.3 GHz | 5.2 GHz | A: 0.1 GHz more |
| Cache | |||
| L2 cache | 20 MB | 26 MB | B: 6 MB more |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 24 MB | equal |
| Platform | |||
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 | differs |
| Process node | Intel 7 | no data | no data for B |
| Memory and interfaces | |||
| Memory type | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 | differs |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 | equal |
| Official memory speedFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown. | 5,600 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | B: 800 MT/s more |
| Max memory capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB | B: 64 GB more |
| PCI Express | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 24 lanes | differs |
| Integrated graphics | none | Intel Graphics (4 Xe cores) | differs |
| Power | |||
| Processor Base Power (Intel) | 125 W | 125 W | equal |
| Maximum Turbo Power (Intel) | 181 W | 159 W | A: 22 W higher |
Cores and clocks
Cores
A14 (6P + 8E)
B14 (6P + 8E)
equalCores of different types may differ in performance.
Threads
A20
B14
A: 6 moreBase clock
A3.5 GHz
B4.2 GHz
B: 0.7 GHz moreFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.
Max clock (Boost/Turbo)
A5.3 GHz
B5.2 GHz
A: 0.1 GHz more
Cache
L2 cache
A20 MB
B26 MB
B: 6 MB moreL3 cache
A24 MB
B24 MB
equal
Platform
Socket
ALGA1700
BLGA1851
differsProcess node
AIntel 7
Bno data
no data for B
Memory and interfaces
Memory type
ADDR4, DDR5
BDDR5
differsMemory channels
A2
B2
equalOfficial memory speed
A5,600 MT/s
B6,400 MT/s
B: 800 MT/s moreFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.
Max memory capacity
A192 GB
B256 GB
B: 64 GB morePCI Express
APCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes
BPCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 24 lanes
differsIntegrated graphics
Anone
BIntel Graphics (4 Xe cores)
differs
Power
Processor Base Power (Intel)
A125 W
B125 W
equalMaximum Turbo Power (Intel)
A181 W
B159 W
A: 22 W higher
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Platform compatibility
Socket Incompatible
Intel Core i5-14600KF uses LGA1700, Intel Core Ultra 5 245K uses LGA1851. The CPUs are not interchangeable: switching requires a different motherboard.
Memory Needs checking
Both controllers support DDR5. The motherboard determines the memory type, so check its specification.
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Do Intel Core i5-14600KF and Intel Core Ultra 5 245K fit the same motherboard?
No: Intel Core i5-14600KF uses LGA1700, while Intel Core Ultra 5 245K uses LGA1851.
How many cores and threads do Intel Core i5-14600KF and Intel Core Ultra 5 245K have?
Intel Core i5-14600KF: 14 cores / 20 threads. Intel Core Ultra 5 245K: 14 cores / 14 threads (manufacturer data).
Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?
Intel Core i5-14600KF: no. Intel Core Ultra 5 245K: Intel Graphics (4 Xe cores).
Which is faster: Intel Core i5-14600KF or Intel Core Ultra 5 245K?
Intel Core i5-14600KF leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- Intel — specifications of Intel Core i5-14600KF, specifications of Intel Core Ultra 5 245Kchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.