Core i5-14400F vs Ryzen 5 5600X: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
Intel Core i5-14400F leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIMulti-thread performance
A +33.8%Intel Core i5-14400F leads in this scenario (up to 33.8% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Core i5-14400F is better5
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 33.8% faster203 samples/min vs 152 samples/min
Cores 4 more10 (6P + 4E) vs 6
Threads 4 more16 vs 12
L2 cache 6.5 MB more9.5 MB vs 3 MB
Official memory speed 1,600 MT/s more4,800 MT/s vs 3,200 MT/s
Where Ryzen 5 5600X is better1
L3 cache 12 MB more32 MB vs 20 MB
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- A ahead by 33.8%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better
Core i5-14400F202.8 samples/minRyzen 5 5600X151.6 samples/minPosition among tested models (89)
B · 152A · 2030200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. Intel Core i5-14400F is ahead by 33.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · Intel Core i5-14400F
202.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 39 · November 15, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 39 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 193.6–209.16; submissions 2025-07-20 to 2026-06-30; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.
- B · AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
151.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 239 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 239 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 140.51–170.61; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-03-08; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (2)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 196.5 | 148.2 | A +32.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 183.5 | 146.2 | A +25.6% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (34)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 193.6 | 142.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 207 | 162.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 212.8 | 161.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 209.2 | 150.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 181.3 | 140.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 196 | 136.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 226.7 | 162.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81CPU, bmw27 (CPU) | — | 216.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, bmw27 (CPU) | — | 202.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, bmw27 (CPU) | — | 233.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1CPU, bmw27 (CPU) | — | 267 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81CPU, classroom (CPU) | — | 608.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, classroom (CPU) | — | 662.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, classroom (CPU) | — | 590.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1CPU, classroom (CPU) | — | 623 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81CPU, fishy_cat (CPU) | — | 310.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, fishy_cat (CPU) | — | 298 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1CPU, fishy_cat (CPU) | — | 297.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, koro (CPU) | — | 448.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1CPU, koro (CPU) | — | 449.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, pavillon_barcelona (CPU) | — | 624.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1CPU, pavillon_barcelona (CPU) | — | 621 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, victor (CPU) | — | 991.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1CPU, victor (CPU) | — | 983.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 170 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 160.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 163.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 160.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 163 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 165.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 158.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 149.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 152 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 149.7 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · Core i5-14400F | B · Ryzen 5 5600X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores and clocks | |||
| CoresCores of different types may differ in performance. | 10 (6P + 4E) | 6 | A: 4 more |
| Threads | 16 | 12 | A: 4 more |
| Base clockFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown. | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz | B: 1.2 GHz more |
| Max clock (Boost/Turbo) | 4.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz | A: 0.1 GHz more |
| Unlocked multiplier | no data | yes | no data for A |
| Cache | |||
| L2 cache | 9.5 MB | 3 MB | A: 6.5 MB more |
| L3 cache | 20 MB | 32 MB | B: 12 MB more |
| Platform | |||
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 | differs |
| Process node | Intel 7 | TSMC 7 nm FinFET | differs |
| Memory and interfaces | |||
| Memory type | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 | differs |
| Memory channels | 2 | no data | no data for B |
| Official memory speedFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown. | 4,800 MT/s | 3,200 MT/s | A: 1,600 MT/s more |
| Max memory capacity | 192 GB | no data | no data for B |
| PCI Express | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes | PCIe 4.0 | differs |
| Integrated graphics | none | none | equal |
| Power | |||
| TDP (AMD method)AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP. | no data | 65 W | no data for A |
| Processor Base Power (Intel) | 65 W | no data | no data for B |
| Maximum Turbo Power (Intel) | 148 W | no data | no data for B |
Cores and clocks
Cores
A10 (6P + 4E)
B6
A: 4 moreCores of different types may differ in performance.
Threads
A16
B12
A: 4 moreBase clock
A2.5 GHz
B3.7 GHz
B: 1.2 GHz moreFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.
Max clock (Boost/Turbo)
A4.7 GHz
B4.6 GHz
A: 0.1 GHz moreUnlocked multiplier
Ano data
Byes
no data for A
Cache
L2 cache
A9.5 MB
B3 MB
A: 6.5 MB moreL3 cache
A20 MB
B32 MB
B: 12 MB more
Platform
Socket
ALGA1700
BAM4
differsProcess node
AIntel 7
BTSMC 7 nm FinFET
differs
Memory and interfaces
Memory type
ADDR4, DDR5
BDDR4
differsMemory channels
A2
Bno data
no data for BOfficial memory speed
A4,800 MT/s
B3,200 MT/s
A: 1,600 MT/s moreFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.
Max memory capacity
A192 GB
Bno data
no data for BPCI Express
APCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes
BPCIe 4.0
differsIntegrated graphics
Anone
Bnone
equal
Power
TDP (AMD method)
Ano data
B65 W
no data for AAMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.
Processor Base Power (Intel)
A65 W
Bno data
no data for BMaximum Turbo Power (Intel)
A148 W
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Platform compatibility
Socket Incompatible
Intel Core i5-14400F uses LGA1700, AMD Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4. The CPUs are not interchangeable: switching requires a different motherboard.
Memory Needs checking
Both controllers support DDR4. The motherboard determines the memory type, so check its specification.
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Do Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X fit the same motherboard?
No: Intel Core i5-14400F uses LGA1700, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4.
How many cores and threads do Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X have?
Intel Core i5-14400F: 10 cores / 16 threads. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: 6 cores / 12 threads (manufacturer data).
Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?
Intel Core i5-14400F: no. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: no.
Which is faster: Intel Core i5-14400F or AMD Ryzen 5 5600X?
Intel Core i5-14400F leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (4)
- Intel — specifications of Intel Core i5-14400Fchecked November 7, 2026
- AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 5 5600Xchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.