Skip to content
RU

Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 5 7600X: specs and benchmark comparison

AIntel · Raptor Lake

Intel Core i5-13400F

  • 10 cores / 16 threads
  • up to 4.6 GHz
  • LGA1700

2023

BAMD · Zen 4

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

  • 6 cores / 12 threads
  • up to 5.3 GHz
  • AM5

September 27, 2022 · $299 at launch

Short verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Compare with AI
← Core i5-13400FRyzen 5 7600X →
  • Multi-thread performance

    B +7.5%

    AMD Ryzen 5 7600X leads in this scenario (up to 7.5% in comparable benchmarks).

No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where Core i5-13400F is better4

  • Cores 4 more10 (6P + 4E) vs 6

  • Threads 4 more16 vs 12

  • L2 cache 3.5 MB more9.5 MB vs 6 MB

  • Max memory capacity 64 GB more192 GB vs 128 GB

Where Ryzen 5 7600X is better2

  • L3 cache 12 MB more32 MB vs 20 MB

  • Official memory speed 400 MT/s more5,200 MT/s vs 4,800 MT/s

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

    CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

    0.2% difference, within the threshold

    Position among tested models (89)

    A · 206B · 206
    0200400600800
    Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

    The 0.2% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).

    About the measurement and source
    A · Intel Core i5-13400F

    205.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 74 · November 15, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 74 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 193.83–211.67; submissions 2025-07-20 to 2026-07-30; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.

    B · AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

    206 samples/min · community measurement, sample 128 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 128 submissions (16 outliers excluded), interquartile range 197.58–227.6; submissions 2025-07-21 to 2026-08-26; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Other comparable benchmarks (7)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom180.9194.5B +7.5%
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom217.2223.1B +2.7%
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom215.6213.5A +1%
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom202213.5B +5.7%
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom195206.7B +6%
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom200201.4B +0.7%
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom186192.8B +3.7%

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Reference results (8)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom199.4231.6reference
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom197.6217.8reference
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom205.1221.6reference
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom223.7233.7reference
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom194.7202.8reference
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom195.1188.2reference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom204.6198reference
Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—207.3no pair

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Cores and clocks

  • Cores

    A10 (6P + 4E)

    B6

    A: 4 more

    Cores of different types may differ in performance.

  • Threads

    A16

    B12

    A: 4 more
  • Base clock

    A2.5 GHz

    B4.7 GHz

    B: 2.2 GHz more

    For hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.

  • Max clock (Boost/Turbo)

    A4.6 GHz

    B5.3 GHz

    B: 0.7 GHz more
  • Unlocked multiplier

    Ano data

    Byes

    no data for A

Cache

  • L1 cache

    Ano data

    B384 KB

    no data for A
  • L2 cache

    A9.5 MB

    B6 MB

    A: 3.5 MB more
  • L3 cache

    A20 MB

    B32 MB

    B: 12 MB more

Platform

  • Socket

    ALGA1700

    BAM5

    differs
  • Process node

    AIntel 7

    BTSMC 5 nm FinFET

    differs

Memory and interfaces

  • Memory type

    ADDR4, DDR5

    BDDR5

    differs
  • Memory channels

    A2

    B2

    equal
  • Official memory speed

    A4,800 MT/s

    B5,200 MT/s

    B: 400 MT/s more

    For controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.

  • Max memory capacity

    A192 GB

    B128 GB

    A: 64 GB more
  • PCI Express

    APCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes

    BPCIe 5.0, 24 lanes

    differs
  • Integrated graphics

    Anone

    BAMD Radeon Graphics (2 CU)

    differs

Power

  • TDP (AMD method)

    Ano data

    B105 W

    no data for A

    AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.

  • Processor Base Power (Intel)

    A65 W

    Bno data

    no data for B
  • Maximum Turbo Power (Intel)

    A148 W

    Bno data

    no data for B

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Platform compatibility

  • Socket Incompatible

    Intel Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700, AMD Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5. The CPUs are not interchangeable: switching requires a different motherboard.

  • Memory Needs checking

    Both controllers support DDR5. The motherboard determines the memory type, so check its specification.

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

Do Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Ryzen 5 7600X fit the same motherboard?

No: Intel Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700, while AMD Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5.

How many cores and threads do Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Ryzen 5 7600X have?

Intel Core i5-13400F: 10 cores / 16 threads. AMD Ryzen 5 7600X: 6 cores / 12 threads (manufacturer data).

Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

Intel Core i5-13400F: no. AMD Ryzen 5 7600X: AMD Radeon Graphics (2 CU).

Which is faster: Intel Core i5-13400F or AMD Ryzen 5 7600X?

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Data sources (4)
  • Intel — specifications of Intel Core i5-13400Fchecked November 7, 2026
  • AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 5 7600Xchecked November 7, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
  • Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK