Core i5-1335U vs Core i9-13900H: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
Intel Core i9-13900H leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIMulti-thread performance
B +163.7%Intel Core i9-13900H leads in this scenario (up to 163.7% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Core i5-1335U is better1
Processor Base Power (Intel) 30 W lower15 W vs 45 W
Where Core i9-13900H is better4
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 163.7% faster203 samples/min vs 77 samples/min
Cores 4 more14 (6P + 8E) vs 10 (2P + 8E)
Threads 8 more20 vs 12
L3 cache 12 MB more24 MB vs 12 MB
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
- B ahead by 163.7%
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0
CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better
Core i5-1335U77.1 samples/minCore i9-13900H203.2 samples/minPosition among tested models (52)
A · 77B · 2030200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. Intel Core i9-13900H is ahead by 163.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · Intel Core i5-1335U
77.1 samples/min · community measurement, sample 20 · November 15, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 48.29–99.17; submissions 2024-04-12 to 2024-07-06; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.
- B · Intel Core i9-13900H
203.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 33 · November 15, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 33 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 140.92–221.98; submissions 2024-03-31 to 2024-11-25; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Reference results (13)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 95.6 | 153.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 77.9 | 185.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 108.8 | 207.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 39 | 217.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 65.3 | 210.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 83.9 | 262 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 75.7 | 230.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 82.6 | 190.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 76.7 | 215.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 53.4 | 207.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 67.6 | 196.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 45.7 | 163.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 196.8 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.
| Specification | A · Core i5-1335U | B · Core i9-13900H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores and clocks | |||
| CoresCores of different types may differ in performance. | 10 (2P + 8E) | 14 (6P + 8E) | B: 4 more |
| Threads | 12 | 20 | B: 8 more |
| Max clock (Boost/Turbo) | 4.6 GHz | 5.4 GHz | B: 0.8 GHz more |
| Cache | |||
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 24 MB | B: 12 MB more |
| Platform | |||
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1744 | equal |
| Process node | Intel 7 | Intel 7 | equal |
| Memory and interfaces | |||
| Memory type | DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4x, LPDDR5/x | DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4x, LPDDR5/x | equal |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 | equal |
| Official memory speedFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown. | 5,200 MT/s | 5,200 MT/s | equal |
| Max memory capacity | 96 GB | 96 GB | equal |
| PCI Express | PCIe 4.0, 20 lanes | PCIe 5.0, 28 lanes | differs |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Iris Xe Graphics (eligible) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics (eligible) | equal |
| Power | |||
| Processor Base Power (Intel) | 15 W | 45 W | B: 30 W higher |
| Maximum Turbo Power (Intel) | 55 W | 115 W | B: 60 W higher |
| Minimum Assured Power (Intel)The lower bound to which the laptop maker can reduce the CPU’s base power. | 12 W | 35 W | B: 23 W higher |
Cores and clocks
Cores
A10 (2P + 8E)
B14 (6P + 8E)
B: 4 moreCores of different types may differ in performance.
Threads
A12
B20
B: 8 moreMax clock (Boost/Turbo)
A4.6 GHz
B5.4 GHz
B: 0.8 GHz more
Cache
L3 cache
A12 MB
B24 MB
B: 12 MB more
Platform
Socket
AFCBGA1744
BFCBGA1744
equalProcess node
AIntel 7
BIntel 7
equal
Memory and interfaces
Memory type
ADDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4x, LPDDR5/x
BDDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4x, LPDDR5/x
equalMemory channels
A2
B2
equalOfficial memory speed
A5,200 MT/s
B5,200 MT/s
equalFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.
Max memory capacity
A96 GB
B96 GB
equalPCI Express
APCIe 4.0, 20 lanes
BPCIe 5.0, 28 lanes
differsIntegrated graphics
AIntel Iris Xe Graphics (eligible)
BIntel Iris Xe Graphics (eligible)
equal
Power
Processor Base Power (Intel)
A15 W
B45 W
B: 30 W higherMaximum Turbo Power (Intel)
A55 W
B115 W
B: 60 W higherMinimum Assured Power (Intel)
A12 W
B35 W
B: 23 W higherThe lower bound to which the laptop maker can reduce the CPU’s base power.
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Do Intel Core i5-1335U and Intel Core i9-13900H fit the same motherboard?
Both CPUs use the FCBGA1744 socket. Support on a specific board depends on the chipset and BIOS version, so check the board maker’s CPU support list.
How many cores and threads do Intel Core i5-1335U and Intel Core i9-13900H have?
Intel Core i5-1335U: 10 cores / 12 threads. Intel Core i9-13900H: 14 cores / 20 threads (manufacturer data).
Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?
Intel Core i5-1335U: Intel Iris Xe Graphics (eligible). Intel Core i9-13900H: Intel Iris Xe Graphics (eligible).
Which is faster: Intel Core i5-1335U or Intel Core i9-13900H?
Intel Core i9-13900H leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Intel — specifications of Intel Core i5-1335U, specifications of Intel Core i9-13900Hchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.