Skip to content
RU

Core i5-12600K vs Core i5-14400F: specs and benchmark comparison

AIntel · Alder Lake

Intel Core i5-12600K

  • 10 cores / 16 threads
  • up to 4.9 GHz
  • LGA1700

2021 · $289 at launch

BIntel · Raptor Lake Refresh

Intel Core i5-14400F

  • 10 cores / 16 threads
  • up to 4.7 GHz
  • LGA1700

2024

Short verdict

Intel Core i5-12600K leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Compare with AI
← Core i5-12600KCore i5-14400F →
  • Multi-thread performance

    A +21.4%

    Intel Core i5-12600K leads in this scenario (up to 21.4% in comparable benchmarks).

No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where Core i5-12600K is better1

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 10.7% faster225 samples/min vs 203 samples/min

Where Core i5-14400F is better2

  • Max memory capacity 64 GB more192 GB vs 128 GB

  • Processor Base Power (Intel) 60 W lower65 W vs 125 W

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

    CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

    A ahead by 10.7%

    Position among tested models (89)

    B · 203A · 225
    0200400600800
    Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

    Intel Core i5-12600K is ahead by 10.7% in this benchmark.

    About the measurement and source
    A · Intel Core i5-12600K

    224.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 42 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 212.87–251.04; submissions 2025-07-23 to 2026-03-07; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    B · Intel Core i5-14400F

    202.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 39 · November 15, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 39 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 193.6–209.16; submissions 2025-07-20 to 2026-06-30; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-15.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Other comparable benchmarks (2)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom219.5196.5A +11.7%
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom222.9183.5A +21.4%

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Reference results (16)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom209.3193.6reference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom172207reference
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom226.9212.8reference
Blender Benchmark 3.0.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom241.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom234.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.2CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom253.2—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom259.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom237.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom253.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom234.6—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom235.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom227.2—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom225.6209.2reference
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom213.6181.3reference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom241.4226.7reference
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—196no pair

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Cores and clocks

  • Cores

    A10 (6P + 4E)

    B10 (6P + 4E)

    equal

    Cores of different types may differ in performance.

  • Threads

    A16

    B16

    equal
  • Base clock

    A3.7 GHz

    B2.5 GHz

    A: 1.2 GHz more

    For hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.

  • Max clock (Boost/Turbo)

    A4.9 GHz

    B4.7 GHz

    A: 0.2 GHz more

Cache

  • L2 cache

    A9.5 MB

    B9.5 MB

    equal
  • L3 cache

    A20 MB

    B20 MB

    equal

Platform

  • Socket

    ALGA1700

    BLGA1700

    equal
  • Process node

    AIntel 7

    BIntel 7

    equal

Memory and interfaces

  • Memory type

    ADDR4, DDR5

    BDDR4, DDR5

    equal
  • Memory channels

    A2

    B2

    equal
  • Official memory speed

    A4,800 MT/s

    B4,800 MT/s

    equal

    For controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.

  • Max memory capacity

    A128 GB

    B192 GB

    B: 64 GB more
  • PCI Express

    APCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes

    BPCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes

    equal
  • Integrated graphics

    AIntel UHD Graphics 770

    Bnone

    differs

Power

  • Processor Base Power (Intel)

    A125 W

    B65 W

    A: 60 W higher
  • Maximum Turbo Power (Intel)

    A150 W

    B148 W

    A: 2 W higher

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Platform compatibility

  • Socket and BIOS support Needs checking

    Both models use LGA1700, but support on a specific motherboard depends on the chipset and BIOS version. Check the board maker’s CPU support list.

  • Memory Needs checking

    Both controllers support DDR4/DDR5. The motherboard determines the memory type, so check its specification.

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

Do Intel Core i5-12600K and Intel Core i5-14400F fit the same motherboard?

Both CPUs use the LGA1700 socket. Support on a specific board depends on the chipset and BIOS version, so check the board maker’s CPU support list.

How many cores and threads do Intel Core i5-12600K and Intel Core i5-14400F have?

Intel Core i5-12600K: 10 cores / 16 threads. Intel Core i5-14400F: 10 cores / 16 threads (manufacturer data).

Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

Intel Core i5-12600K: Intel UHD Graphics 770. Intel Core i5-14400F: no.

Which is faster: Intel Core i5-12600K or Intel Core i5-14400F?

Intel Core i5-12600K leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Data sources (3)
  • Intel — specifications of Intel Core i5-12600K, specifications of Intel Core i5-14400Fchecked November 7, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0checked November 14, 2026
  • Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK