Skip to content
RU

Apple M5 Pro vs Core Ultra 7 265K: specs and benchmark comparison

AApple · ARM64

Apple M5 Pro

    2026

    BIntel · Arrow Lake

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

    • 20 cores / 20 threads
    • up to 5.5 GHz
    • LGA1851

    October 24, 2024 · $394 at launch

    Short verdict

    In the available comparable benchmarks the difference is below the noticeable threshold, so no significant advantage was found.

    Compare with AI
    ← Apple M5 ProCore Ultra 7 265K →
    • Multi-thread performance

      ≈ parity

      The difference in available benchmarks is below the noticeable threshold, so there is no significant advantage.

    No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

    Advantages

    Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

    Where Apple M5 Pro is better0

    No advantages found in our data.

    Where Core Ultra 7 265K is better1

    • Max memory capacity 192 GB more256 GB vs 64 GB

    Benchmarks

    Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

    • Blender Benchmark 5.2.0

      CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

      4.6% difference, within the threshold

      Position among tested models (49)

      B · 482A · 505
      0200400600800
      Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

      The 4.6% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).

      About the measurement and source
      A · Apple M5 Pro

      504.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 55 · November 14, 2026

      Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

      Median of 55 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 462.69–565.99; submissions 2026-07-21 to 2026-11-08; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

      B · Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

      482.1 samples/min · community measurement, sample 28 · November 14, 2026

      Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

      Median of 28 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 475.75–518.97; submissions 2026-07-21 to 2026-11-02; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

      difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

      Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

    Other comparable benchmarks (2)
    BenchmarkABDifference
    Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom519.9520.7B +0.2%
    Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom525.3537.4B +2.3%

    Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

    Reference results (8)
    BenchmarkABDifference
    Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom522465.4reference
    Blender Benchmark 4.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom536.1478.1reference
    Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom519.9—no pair
    Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom529.5537.2reference
    Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom492.6460reference
    Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom528.6468.3reference
    Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom587.4449.8reference
    Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom509.7514.6reference

    Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

    Specifications

    Cores and clocks

    • Cores

      Ano data

      B20 (8P + 12E)

      no data for A

      Cores of different types may differ in performance.

    • Threads

      Ano data

      B20

      no data for A
    • Base clock

      Ano data

      B3.9 GHz

      no data for A

      For hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.

    • Max clock (Boost/Turbo)

      Ano data

      B5.5 GHz

      no data for A

    Cache

    • L2 cache

      Ano data

      B36 MB

      no data for A
    • L3 cache

      Ano data

      B30 MB

      no data for A

    Platform

    • Socket

      Ano data

      BLGA1851

      no data for A
    • Process node

      A3 nm

      Bno data

      no data for B

    Memory and interfaces

    • Memory type

      AUnified memory

      BDDR5

      differs
    • Memory channels

      Ano data

      B2

      no data for A
    • Official memory speed

      Ano data

      B6,400 MT/s

      no data for A

      For controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.

    • Max memory capacity

      A64 GB

      B256 GB

      B: 192 GB more
    • PCI Express

      Ano data

      BPCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 24 lanes

      no data for A
    • Integrated graphics

      AApple M5 Pro (16 / 20-core GPU)

      BIntel Graphics (4 Xe cores)

      differs

    Power

    • Processor Base Power (Intel)

      Ano data

      B125 W

      no data for A
    • Maximum Turbo Power (Intel)

      Ano data

      B250 W

      no data for A

    “More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

    Compare with AI

    An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

    AI verdict

    Questions and answers

    Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

    Apple M5 Pro: Apple M5 Pro (16 / 20-core GPU). Intel Core Ultra 7 265K: Intel Graphics (4 Xe cores).

    Which is faster: Apple M5 Pro or Intel Core Ultra 7 265K?

    In the available comparable benchmarks the difference is below the noticeable threshold, so no significant advantage was found.

    Data sources (4)
    • Apple — specifications of Apple M5 Prochecked November 14, 2026
    • Intel — specifications of Intel Core Ultra 7 265Kchecked November 7, 2026
    • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0checked November 14, 2026
    • Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026

    How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

    TelegramVK