Skip to content
RU

Apple M4 vs Core i5-12600K: specs and benchmark comparison

AApple · ARM64

Apple M4

    2024

    BIntel · Alder Lake

    Intel Core i5-12600K

    • 10 cores / 16 threads
    • up to 4.9 GHz
    • LGA1700

    2021 · $289 at launch

    Short verdict

    Apple M4 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

    Compare with AI
    ← Apple M4Core i5-12600K →
    • Multi-thread performance

      A +10.5%

      Apple M4 leads in this scenario (up to 10.5% in comparable benchmarks).

    No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

    Advantages

    Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

    Where Apple M4 is better0

    No advantages found in our data.

    Where Core i5-12600K is better1

    • Max memory capacity 96 GB more128 GB vs 32 GB

    Benchmarks

    Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

    • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

      CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

      0.1% difference, within the threshold

      Position among tested models (89)

      A · 224B · 225
      0200400600800
      Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

      The 0.1% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).

      About the measurement and source
      A · Apple M4

      224.3 samples/min · community measurement, sample 245 · November 14, 2026

      Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

      Median of 245 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 216.82–236.23; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-05-09; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

      B · Intel Core i5-12600K

      224.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026

      Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

      Median of 42 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 212.87–251.04; submissions 2025-07-23 to 2026-03-07; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

      difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

      Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

    Other comparable benchmarks (3)
    BenchmarkABDifference
    Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom231.3209.3A +10.5%
    Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom234213.6A +9.6%
    Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom222.1222.9B +0.3%

    Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

    Reference results (16)
    BenchmarkABDifference
    Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom215.8172reference
    Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom214.2226.9reference
    Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom230.7227.2reference
    Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom232219.5reference
    Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom214.2225.6reference
    Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom220.1—no pair
    Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom216.8241.4reference
    Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom205.5—no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.0.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—241.5no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—234.8no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.1.2CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—253.2no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—259.9no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—237.5no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—253.3no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—234.6no pair
    Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—235.3no pair

    Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

    Specifications

    Cores and clocks

    • Cores

      Ano data

      B10 (6P + 4E)

      no data for A

      Cores of different types may differ in performance.

    • Threads

      Ano data

      B16

      no data for A
    • Base clock

      Ano data

      B3.7 GHz

      no data for A

      For hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.

    • Max clock (Boost/Turbo)

      Ano data

      B4.9 GHz

      no data for A

    Cache

    • L2 cache

      Ano data

      B9.5 MB

      no data for A
    • L3 cache

      Ano data

      B20 MB

      no data for A

    Platform

    • Socket

      Ano data

      BLGA1700

      no data for A
    • Process node

      A3 nm

      BIntel 7

      differs

    Memory and interfaces

    • Memory type

      AUnified memory

      BDDR4, DDR5

      differs
    • Memory channels

      Ano data

      B2

      no data for A
    • Official memory speed

      Ano data

      B4,800 MT/s

      no data for A

      For controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.

    • Max memory capacity

      A32 GB

      B128 GB

      B: 96 GB more
    • PCI Express

      Ano data

      BPCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes

      no data for A
    • Integrated graphics

      AApple M4 (8 / 10-core GPU)

      BIntel UHD Graphics 770

      differs

    Power

    • Processor Base Power (Intel)

      Ano data

      B125 W

      no data for A
    • Maximum Turbo Power (Intel)

      Ano data

      B150 W

      no data for A

    “More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

    Compare with AI

    An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

    AI verdict

    Questions and answers

    Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

    Apple M4: Apple M4 (8 / 10-core GPU). Intel Core i5-12600K: Intel UHD Graphics 770.

    Which is faster: Apple M4 or Intel Core i5-12600K?

    Apple M4 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

    Data sources (4)
    • Apple — specifications of Apple M4checked November 14, 2026
    • Intel — specifications of Intel Core i5-12600Kchecked November 7, 2026
    • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
    • Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026

    How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

    TelegramVK