Apple M4 Max vs Apple M4 Pro: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
Apple M4 Max leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIMulti-thread performance
A +40%Apple M4 Max leads in this scenario (up to 40% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Apple M4 Max is better2
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 37.1% faster472 samples/min vs 344 samples/min
Max memory capacity 64 GB more128 GB vs 64 GB
Where Apple M4 Pro is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- A ahead by 37.1%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better
Apple M4 Max471.6 samples/minApple M4 Pro343.9 samples/minPosition among tested models (89)
B · 344A · 4720200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. Apple M4 Max is ahead by 37.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · Apple M4 Max
471.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 133 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 133 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 420.8–491.69; submissions 2025-07-19 to 2026-03-13; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · Apple M4 Pro
343.9 samples/min · community measurement, sample 166 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 166 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 337.64–397.75; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-08-18; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (5)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 468 | 390.9 | A +19.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 467.3 | 371 | A +25.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 403.7 | 358.8 | A +12.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 479 | 342.2 | A +40% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 471.9 | 339.6 | A +38.9% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (6)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 422.8 | 394.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 479.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 486.4 | 332.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 410 | 332.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 398.1 | 317.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 410.2 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · Apple M4 Max | B · Apple M4 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platform | |||
| Process node | 3 nm | 3 nm | equal |
| Memory and interfaces | |||
| Memory type | Unified memory | Unified memory | equal |
| Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB | A: 64 GB more |
| Integrated graphics | Apple M4 Max (32 / 40-core GPU) | Apple M4 Pro (16 / 20-core GPU) | differs |
Platform
Process node
A3 nm
B3 nm
equal
Memory and interfaces
Memory type
AUnified memory
BUnified memory
equalMax memory capacity
A128 GB
B64 GB
A: 64 GB moreIntegrated graphics
AApple M4 Max (32 / 40-core GPU)
BApple M4 Pro (16 / 20-core GPU)
differs
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?
Apple M4 Max: Apple M4 Max (32 / 40-core GPU). Apple M4 Pro: Apple M4 Pro (16 / 20-core GPU).
Which is faster: Apple M4 Max or Apple M4 Pro?
Apple M4 Max leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Apple — specifications of Apple M4 Max, specifications of Apple M4 Prochecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.