Skip to content
RU

Apple M4 (10-core CPU) vs Core i5-12600K: specs and benchmark comparison

AApple · ARM64

Apple M4 (10-core CPU)

  • 10 cores

2024

BIntel · Alder Lake

Intel Core i5-12600K

  • 10 cores / 16 threads
  • up to 4.9 GHz
  • LGA1700

2021 · $289 at launch

Short verdict

Apple M4 (10-core CPU) leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Compare with AI
← Apple M4 (10-core CPU)Core i5-12600K →
  • Multi-thread performance

    A +10.5%

    Apple M4 (10-core CPU) leads in this scenario (up to 10.5% in comparable benchmarks).

No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where Apple M4 (10-core CPU) is better0

No advantages found in our data.

Where Core i5-12600K is better0

No advantages found in our data.

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

    CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

    0.1% difference, within the threshold

    Position among tested models (89)

    A · 224B · 225
    0200400600800
    Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

    The 0.1% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).

    About the measurement and source
    A · Apple M4 (10-core CPU)

    224.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 244 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 244 submissions (12 outliers excluded), interquartile range 216.85–236.23; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-05-09; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    B · Intel Core i5-12600K

    224.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 42 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 212.87–251.04; submissions 2025-07-23 to 2026-03-07; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Other comparable benchmarks (3)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom231.3209.3A +10.5%
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom234.2213.6A +9.6%
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom222.1222.9B +0.3%

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Reference results (16)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom215.8172reference
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom214.2226.9reference
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom230.7227.2reference
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom232219.5reference
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom214.2225.6reference
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom220.1—no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom216.8241.4reference
Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom205.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.0.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—241.5no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—234.8no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.2CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—253.2no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—259.9no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—237.5no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—253.3no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—234.6no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—235.3no pair

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Cores and clocks

  • Cores

    A10 (4P + 6E)

    B10 (6P + 4E)

    equal

    Cores of different types may differ in performance.

  • Threads

    Ano data

    B16

    no data for A
  • Base clock

    Ano data

    B3.7 GHz

    no data for A

    For hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.

  • Max clock (Boost/Turbo)

    Ano data

    B4.9 GHz

    no data for A

Cache

  • L2 cache

    Ano data

    B9.5 MB

    no data for A
  • L3 cache

    Ano data

    B20 MB

    no data for A

Platform

  • Socket

    Ano data

    BLGA1700

    no data for A
  • Process node

    A3 nm

    BIntel 7

    differs

Memory and interfaces

  • Memory type

    AUnified memory

    BDDR4, DDR5

    differs
  • Memory channels

    Ano data

    B2

    no data for A
  • Official memory speed

    Ano data

    B4,800 MT/s

    no data for A

    For controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.

  • Max memory capacity

    Ano data

    B128 GB

    no data for A
  • PCI Express

    Ano data

    BPCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes

    no data for A
  • Integrated graphics

    AApple M4 (8 / 10-core GPU)

    BIntel UHD Graphics 770

    differs

Power

  • Processor Base Power (Intel)

    Ano data

    B125 W

    no data for A
  • Maximum Turbo Power (Intel)

    Ano data

    B150 W

    no data for A

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

Apple M4 (10-core CPU): Apple M4 (8 / 10-core GPU). Intel Core i5-12600K: Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Which is faster: Apple M4 (10-core CPU) or Intel Core i5-12600K?

Apple M4 (10-core CPU) leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Data sources (4)
  • Apple — specifications of Apple M4 (10-core CPU)checked November 14, 2026
  • Intel — specifications of Intel Core i5-12600Kchecked November 7, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
  • Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK