Apple M2 Pro vs Ryzen 5 7600X: specs and benchmark comparison
BAMD · Zen 4
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- 6 cores / 12 threads
- up to 5.3 GHz
- AM5
September 27, 2022 · $299 at launch
Multi-thread performance
depends on the taskBenchmark results disagree, so the choice depends on the specific task.
No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Apple M2 Pro is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where Ryzen 5 7600X is better1
Max memory capacity 96 GB more128 GB vs 32 GB
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- 0.1% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better
Apple M2 Pro205.8 samples/minRyzen 5 7600X206 samples/minPosition among tested models (89)
A · 206B · 2060200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. The 0.1% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · Apple M2 Pro
205.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 198.99–244.86; submissions 2025-07-23 to 2026-08-21; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
206 samples/min · community measurement, sample 128 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 128 submissions (16 outliers excluded), interquartile range 197.58–227.6; submissions 2025-07-21 to 2026-08-26; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (7)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 197 | 194.5 | A +1.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 200.5 | 223.1 | B +11.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 196.5 | 213.5 | B +8.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 198 | 213.5 | B +7.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 197.8 | 206.7 | B +4.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 199.4 | 201.4 | B +1% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 203 | 192.8 | A +5.3% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (8)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 240.7 | 231.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 192.8 | 217.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 149.5 | 221.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 197.7 | 202.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 202 | 188.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 199.2 | 198 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 233.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | — | 207.3 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · Apple M2 Pro | B · Ryzen 5 7600X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores and clocks | |||
| CoresCores of different types may differ in performance. | no data | 6 | no data for A |
| Threads | no data | 12 | no data for A |
| Base clockFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown. | no data | 4.7 GHz | no data for A |
| Max clock (Boost/Turbo) | no data | 5.3 GHz | no data for A |
| Unlocked multiplier | no data | yes | no data for A |
| Cache | |||
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB | no data for A |
| L2 cache | no data | 6 MB | no data for A |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB | no data for A |
| Platform | |||
| Socket | no data | AM5 | no data for A |
| Process node | 5 nm | TSMC 5 nm FinFET | differs |
| Memory and interfaces | |||
| Memory type | Unified memory | DDR5 | differs |
| Memory channels | no data | 2 | no data for A |
| Official memory speedFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown. | no data | 5,200 MT/s | no data for A |
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB | B: 96 GB more |
| PCI Express | no data | PCIe 5.0, 24 lanes | no data for A |
| Integrated graphics | Apple M2 Pro (16 / 19-core GPU) | AMD Radeon Graphics (2 CU) | differs |
| Power | |||
| TDP (AMD method)AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP. | no data | 105 W | no data for A |
Cores and clocks
Cores
Ano data
B6
no data for ACores of different types may differ in performance.
Threads
Ano data
B12
no data for ABase clock
Ano data
B4.7 GHz
no data for AFor hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.
Max clock (Boost/Turbo)
Ano data
B5.3 GHz
no data for AUnlocked multiplier
Ano data
Byes
no data for A
Cache
L1 cache
Ano data
B384 KB
no data for AL2 cache
Ano data
B6 MB
no data for AL3 cache
Ano data
B32 MB
no data for A
Platform
Socket
Ano data
BAM5
no data for AProcess node
A5 nm
BTSMC 5 nm FinFET
differs
Memory and interfaces
Memory type
AUnified memory
BDDR5
differsMemory channels
Ano data
B2
no data for AOfficial memory speed
Ano data
B5,200 MT/s
no data for AFor controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.
Max memory capacity
A32 GB
B128 GB
B: 96 GB morePCI Express
Ano data
BPCIe 5.0, 24 lanes
no data for AIntegrated graphics
AApple M2 Pro (16 / 19-core GPU)
BAMD Radeon Graphics (2 CU)
differs
Power
TDP (AMD method)
Ano data
B105 W
no data for AAMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?
Apple M2 Pro: Apple M2 Pro (16 / 19-core GPU). AMD Ryzen 5 7600X: AMD Radeon Graphics (2 CU).
Which is faster: Apple M2 Pro or AMD Ryzen 5 7600X?
It depends on the task: multi-thread performance: results disagree.
See also
Data sources (4)
- Apple — specifications of Apple M2 Prochecked November 14, 2026
- AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 5 7600Xchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.