Apple M1 Pro (10-core CPU) vs Apple M3 Ultra (28-core CPU): specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
Not enough data for a performance conclusion: the database has no comparable benchmarks for this pair. Below are the key differences in official specifications.
Compare with AIAdvantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where Apple M1 Pro (10-core CPU) is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where Apple M3 Ultra (28-core CPU) is better1
Cores 18 more28 (20P + 8E) vs 10 (8P + 2E)
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better
Apple M1 Pro (10-core CPU)210.5 samples/minApple M3 Ultra (28-core CPU)713.6 samples/minNo advantage conclusion: small sample in one of the results.
About the measurement and source
- A · Apple M1 Pro (10-core CPU)
210.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 34 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 34 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 197.22–214.35; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-09-23; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · Apple M3 Ultra (28-core CPU)
713.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 18 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 18 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 708.99–716.71; submissions 2025-07-22 to 2026-02-16; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Reference results (19)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 195.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 201.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 195 | 660.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 200.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 188.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 180.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 196.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 194.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 215 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 203 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 203.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 203.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 208.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 197.2 | 698.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 196.1 | 682.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 195.5 | 706.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 200.7 | 696.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 202.7 | 692.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom | 158.3 | — | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · Apple M1 Pro (10-core CPU) | B · Apple M3 Ultra (28-core CPU) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores and clocks | |||
| CoresCores of different types may differ in performance. | 10 (8P + 2E) | 28 (20P + 8E) | B: 18 more |
| Platform | |||
| Process node | 5 nm | 3 nm | differs |
| Memory and interfaces | |||
| Memory type | Unified memory | Unified memory | equal |
| Integrated graphics | Apple M1 Pro (14 / 16-core GPU) | Apple M3 Ultra (60 / 80-core GPU) | differs |
Cores and clocks
Cores
A10 (8P + 2E)
B28 (20P + 8E)
B: 18 moreCores of different types may differ in performance.
Platform
Process node
A5 nm
B3 nm
differs
Memory and interfaces
Memory type
AUnified memory
BUnified memory
equalIntegrated graphics
AApple M1 Pro (14 / 16-core GPU)
BApple M3 Ultra (60 / 80-core GPU)
differs
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?
Apple M1 Pro (10-core CPU): Apple M1 Pro (14 / 16-core GPU). Apple M3 Ultra (28-core CPU): Apple M3 Ultra (60 / 80-core GPU).
See also
Data sources (2)
- Apple — specifications of Apple M1 Pro (10-core CPU), specifications of Apple M3 Ultra (28-core CPU)checked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.